IASbaba's Flagship Course: Integrated Learning Programme (ILP) - 2024 Read Details
Search 19th April, 2020 Spotlight here: http://www.newsonair.com/Main_Audio_Bulletins_Search.aspx
TOPIC:
General Studies 2
General Studies 3
In News: The government has notified changes to the foreign direct investment (FDI) policy and put into effect the requirement of prior clearance for investments from countries with which India shares its land border.
An entity of a country that shares a land border with India can now invest in firms here “only under the Government route”. This also applies to “beneficial” owners — even if the investing company is not located in a neighbouring country, it would still be subject to these conditions if its owner is a citizen or resident of such a country.
Objective: To curb opportunistic takeover due to the Covid-19 pandemic, especially from China
Background
The move comes amid reports of China trying to acquire distressed assets in strategic sectors globally, with companies seeing a substantial fall in their valuations because of the containment measures to rein in the pandemic. In fact, Australia and the European Union have also taken measures to counter the Chinese move. A Brookings India paper pegs the total current and planned Chinese investment in India at over $26 billion.
However, India’s decision may come in the way of home-grown unicorns and startups that aim to expand their businesses. At least 18 of the 23 Indian unicorns, including Paytm, Snapdeal, OYO Rooms, Ola, Swiggy, Zomato, and BigBasket, are backed by Chinese investors such as Alibaba, Tencent and Ant Financial.
The new FDI norms may force these investors to postpone or even stop these funds from topping up their investments or respecting the agreed term sheets. Therefore, the unicorns, which depend on their largest investors to keep the cash flowing, may now have to start looking for new anchor investors. Growth-stage startups may also see investments drying up.
So, has the Government banned foreign investment from China?
The government has not banned foreign investment from China. It has only put a filter to have an oversight to examine the implications of the investment, alarmed by the People’s Bank of China raising its stake in the country’s largest mortgage lender, HDFC Ltd, from 0.8% to 1.01% through open-market purchases in the March quarter. The move led to concerns that India’s most valued companies could be susceptible to hostile takeovers as their market values have taken a severe hit because of covid-19-related uncertainties. This has led to India now talking about legal vetting of not just direct ownership but also beneficial ownership.
What was China’s response?
China has called for India to revise these “discriminatory practices” and treat investments from different countries equally. The additional barriers set by Indian side for investors from specific countries violate WTO’s (World Trade Organization) principle of non-discrimination, and go against the general trend of liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment. More importantly, they do not conform to the consensus of G20 leaders and trade ministers to realize a free, fair, non-discriminatory, transparent, predictable and stable trade and investment environment, and to keep our markets open.
Is this the first time that India has resisted possible Chinese aggression in trade?
The Way Forward
The govt should lay out a clear road map for the approval process for investments from Chinese firms by –
About Ordinance:
Foreign direct investment (FDI)
India’s FDI policy
India’s neighbouring countries: India shares a land border with:
Connecting the Dots: