Category: International Organisations
Context:

About Weimar Triangle:
Source:
Category: Polity and Governance
Context:

About Directorate General of Mines Safety (DGMS):
Source:
Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Vera C. Rubin Observatory:
Source:
Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About M-STrIPES:
Source:
Category: Geography
Context:

About Kamala Hydroelectric Project:
Source:
GS-II: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests, Indian diaspora; important international institutions, agencies and fora — their structure, mandate
Context (Introduction)
The post-Second World War global order was largely shaped and led by the United States through institutions such as the United Nations and the Bretton Woods system. However, recent U.S. policy choices—especially under the Trump administration signal a growing disengagement from the very multilateral architecture it helped create, raising concerns about the future of global governance.
Core Idea
The U.S. is progressively walking away from rules-based multilateralism in favour of unilateral, transactional, and short-term national interest calculations. This shift threatens the stability, legitimacy, and effectiveness of international institutions that have underpinned global cooperation and relative order for decades.
Nature of the U.S. Retreat
Why It Matters
Implications for India
Way Forward
Conclusion
America’s disengagement from the international system it built risks accelerating institutional decay and global disorder. In the absence of a credible alternative leader, the erosion of multilateralism could result in a harsher, more unequal world. Preserving a rules-based order now depends on collective responsibility, adaptive reform, and renewed commitment by both established and emerging powers.
Mains Question
GS-II: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Education.
Context (Introduction)
India’s higher education system is undergoing a significant transition under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, marked by curriculum flexibility, interdisciplinary learning, and regulatory reform. This transformation has gained momentum, but its sustainability hinges critically on building trust between the State and higher education institutions (HEIs).
Core Idea
High-quality education cannot be delivered through regulation alone; it requires institutional autonomy anchored in accountability. Trust between the State and institutions enables innovation in teaching, research, and governance, while excessive control risks stifling academic creativity and global competitiveness.
Trust Deficit and Structural Constraints
Why Trust Matters
Way Forward
Conclusion
India’s higher education reform stands at a decisive moment. Regulatory consolidation and policy clarity have created momentum, but excellence will depend on mutual trust between the State and institutions. A governance model that empowers institutions while ensuring accountability is essential if India is to build a globally competitive, innovation-driven higher education system.
Mains Question