Category: Defence and Security
Context:

About Man Portable Anti-Tank Guided Missile (MPATGM):
Source:
Category: Economy
Context:

About Catastrophe Bonds:
Source:
Category: History and Culture
Context:

About Bhadrakali Temple Inscription:
Source:
Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Bannerghatta National Park:
Source:
Category: International Organisations
Context:

About UNDESA:
Source:
GS-III: Science and Technology—developments and their applications and effects in everyday life; Environmental pollution and degradation; conservation.
Context (Introduction)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sectors ranging from healthcare and agriculture to governance and finance. However, as highlighted in the article, the environmental costs of developing and deploying AI systems have received far less policy attention. With India positioning itself as a global AI hub, ignoring these impacts risks undermining climate and sustainability goals.
Core Idea
AI is not environmentally neutral. The development, training, and deployment of large AI models impose significant energy, water, and carbon costs, necessitating a policy framework that integrates AI governance with environmental regulation and sustainability metrics.
Environmental Impact of AI
Global Regulatory Responses
India’s Policy Gaps and Challenges
Way Forward
Conclusion
As India accelerates AI adoption, environmental sustainability must become a core pillar of AI governance. Measuring, regulating, and disclosing AI’s ecological footprint is essential to ensure that technological progress does not come at the cost of climate stability and resource security. Responsible AI is not only ethical—it is environmentally imperative.
Mains Question
GS-II: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests; India and its bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India.
Context (Introduction)
The global order is witnessing heightened volatility due to renewed U.S. unilateralism, an assertive China, and prolonged instability in Europe following the Russia–Ukraine war. Against this backdrop, India and Germany are recalibrating their bilateral engagement to shape a broader Indo-Europe strategic framework, aimed at enhancing stability, diversification, and resilience in global geopolitics.
Core Idea
The article argues that India–Germany relations are no longer merely bilateral, but central to constructing an Indo-Europe strategic geography that links India’s scale, demography, and market depth with Europe’s industrial strength, technological sophistication, and regulatory capacity—thereby hedging against over-dependence on any single great power.
Key Drivers of India–Germany Convergence
Why the Indo-Europe Idea Matters
Important Historical & Strategic Anchors
Challenges Ahead
Way Forward
Conclusion
In an era of geopolitical churn, India and Germany are moving beyond episodic cooperation toward strategic co-construction. The Indo-Europe idea reflects a pragmatic response to uncertainty—anchored not in alliances, but in diversification, resilience, and shared responsibility. If effectively implemented, it can become a stabilising pillar in an increasingly fragmented global order.
Mains Question