Verify it's really you

Please re-enter your password to continue with this action.

Published on Mar 17, 2026
IASbaba's Daily Current Affairs
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 16th March 2026

Archives


(PRELIMS  Focus)


Acrylonitrile
                    • Category: Science and Technology

                      Context:

                      • Recent computer models have suggested that acrylonitrile, an organic compound present on Saturn’s moon Titan, can self-assemble into cell-like structures.

                      About Acrylonitrile:

                      • Nature: It is a colourless, liquid, man-made chemical with a sharp, onion- or garlic-like odour.
                      • Structure: It consists of a vinyl group linked to a nitrile group.
                        • IUPAC Name: Its IUPAC name is Prop-2-enenitrile.
                        • Production: It is primarily produced via the SOHIO process (catalytic ammoxidation of propylene with ammonia and air) 
                      • Association with water and air: It can be dissolved in water and evaporates quickly. Acrylonitrile vapor is heavier than air.
                        • Reaction with nitrogen: Its combustion produces toxic oxides of nitrogen.
                        • Volatile: It is very volatile, producing flammable and toxic air concentrations at room temperature and may explode.
                      • Storage: It requires storage and handling in closed systems.
                      • Manufacturing of chemicals: Acrylonitrile is used to make other chemicals such as plastics, synthetic rubber, and acrylic fibers.
                        • Pesticides: A mixture of acrylonitrile and carbon tetrachloride was used as a pesticide in the past.
                        • Impact on human health: Acrylonitrile is irritating to the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract. Toxic effects range from headache, fatigue, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting to asphyxiation, lactic acidosis and cardiovascular collapse.
                        • Presence on Titan: Computer models and observations have confirmed the presence of acrylonitrile in the atmosphere of Saturn’s moon, Titan. Scientists hypothesize it could form “azotosomes”—structures similar to cell membranes—making it a subject of interest in astrobiology.
                      • Regulatory status in India: In October 2025, the Indian government withdrew the Quality Control Orders (QCO) for acrylonitrile under the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Act.

                      Source:


Gajapati Empire
                    • Category: History and Culture

                      Context:

                      • A Telugu inscription associated with Gajapathi rulers of Odisha has been discovered on a stone pillar of the historic Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Temple in Guntur city.

                      About Gajapati Empire:

                        • Foundation: It was founded by Kapilendra Deva in 1434 CE, who established the Suryavamsa (Solar dynasty) after the decline of the Eastern Ganga dynasty.
                        • Meaning: The title “Gajapati” literally means “Lord of the Elephants,” signifying the empire’s formidable elephant corps.
                      • Reign: It was a medieval Hindu dynasty in the Indian subcontinent, originally from the region of Odisha, that reigned from c. 1434 to 1541. 
                        • Legacy: It succeeded the Eastern Gangas as the Gajapati monarchs and was founded by Kapilendra Deva of the Suryavamsa lineage after the death of the last ruler of the Eastern Ganga, king Bhanu Deva IV.
                      • Capital: Initially, the capital of the Gajapati Empire was located in Cuttack. However, during the reign of Prataparudra Deva (1497 to 1540), the capital was shifted to Kataka, now known as Konark.
                      • Extent: The Gajapatis, at the height of their power in the 15th century, ruled over an empire extending from the Ganges in the north near Hoogly to the Kaveri in the south.
                      • Important rulers:
                        • Kapilendra Deva (1434–1466): The most powerful ruler, he expanded the empire from the Ganges in the north to the Kaveri in the south. He was a patron of the Odia language and a devotee of Lord Jagannath.
                        • Purushottama Deva (1467–1497): Known for his military resilience against the Bahmani Sultanate and his literary contributions in Sanskrit, such as Abhinava Gitagovinda.
                        • Prataparudra Deva (1497–1540): His reign marked the beginning of the decline due to continuous wars with the Vijayanagara Empire (under Krishnadevaraya) and the Bengal Sultanate. He was a contemporary and follower of the saint Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu.
                      • Religious patronage: The Gajapatis were staunch devotees of Lord Jagannath of Puri, viewing the deity as the true ruler of the empire while they served as “Raut” (deputies).
                      • Architecture: They continued the temple-building traditions of their predecessors. While the Konark Sun Temple was built earlier by the Gangas, the Gajapatis provided significant patronage for its upkeep and the expansion of the Jagannath Temple complex.
                      • Literature: This era is called the “Renaissance of Odia Literature.” Sarala Dasa, the “Adikavi” of Odisha, composed the Mahabharata in Odia during Kapilendra Deva’s reign.
                      • Decline: Constant conflicts with the Vijayanagara Empire and the rising Golconda Sultanate drained the empire’s resources. Frequent succession disputes and the rise of powerful feudal lords (Samantas) weakened central authority.
                      • End: The last ruler, Kakharua Deva, was assassinated by his minister Govinda Vidyadhara in 1541, who then established the Bhoi Dynasty.

                      Source:


National Chambal Sanctuary
                    • Category: Environment and Ecology

                      Context:

                      • Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of media reports about the constant threat caused by sand mining to the eco-sensitive zone of the National Chambal Sanctuary.

                      About National Chambal Sanctuary:

                      • Location: It lies at the tri-junction of three states Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan.
                      • Other names: It is also called the National Chambal Gharial Wildlife Sanctuary.
                      • Uniqueness: It is India’s first and only tri-state riverine protected area.
                        • River source: The sanctuary follows a 425–600 km stretch of the Chambal River, which originates at Janapav (Singar Chouri peak) in the Vindhya Range and joins the Yamuna River at Pachnada, UP.
                        • Topography: It is famous for its ravines (Badland Topography), sandy beaches, and rocky hills.
                      • Pollution-free: The Chambal is often cited as one of India’s cleanest and most unpolluted rivers. 
                      • Key species: The main focus of the sanctuary is to protect the critically endangered Gharial, Red-crowned roof turtle and endangered Ganges dolphin.
                      • Significance: It supports the largest population of Gharials in the wild.
                        • Status: It is a listed Important Bird Area (IBA) and a proposed Ramsar site. 
                      • Vegetation: It is part of the Kathiar-Gir dry deciduous forest ecoregion.
                      • Fauna: It is home to mugger crocodile, smooth-coated otters, Striped Hyena and Indian wolves. It also supports Indian narrow-headed soft shell turtles, three- striped roof turtles and crowned river turtles.

                      Source:


Joha Rice
                    • Category: Miscellaneous

                      Context:

                      • Recently, India has facilitated the export of 25 metric tonnes of Assam’s GI-tagged Joha Rice to the United Kingdom and Italy.

                      About Joha Rice:

                      • Origin: Cultivated for over 600 years in Assam; it was a regal food during the Ahom dynasty.
                      • GI Status: It received the Geographical Indication (GI) tag in 2017.
                      • Uniqueness: It is an indigenous aromatic rice variety known for its distinct fragrance, fine grain texture and rich taste.
                        • Cultivation: It is primarily a Sali (winter) or Kharif crop with a long duration of 120–160 days.
                      • Fragrance: Derived from the aromatic compound 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline; its scent is distinct from Basmati rice, often compared to popcorn or sandalwood.
                      • Varieties: Major types include Kola Joha, Keteki Joha, Bokul Joha, and Kunkuni Joha. 
                        • Diabetes management: It is effective in lowering blood glucose and preventing the onset of diabetes, making it a “nutraceutical of choice”.
                      • Essential fatty acids: It contains Omega-3 (linolenic acid) and Omega-6 (linoleic acid), which are not naturally produced by the human body.
                      • Bioactive compounds: It is rich in antioxidants, flavonoids, and phenolics like oryzanol, ferulic acid, and tocotrienol, which offer cardio-protective benefits.
                      • Balanced ratio: It boasts a more balanced ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 compared to common non-scented rice varieties.
                      • Global export: APEDA facilitated the first major export consignment of 25 metric tonnes to the United Kingdom and Italy in March 2026. Previously, smaller consignments reached Vietnam and Middle Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar.

                      Source:


Deepor Beel
                    • Category: Geography

                      Context:

                      • Illegal earth cutting from a wetland connected to Deepor Beel is continuing unabated in Satmile area of Guwahati, despite restrictions imposed by the Gauhati High Court.

                      About Deepor Beel:

                      • Location: It is a permanent freshwater lake located on the outskirts of Guwahati, Assam. 
                      • Origin: It is a floodplain wetland formed in a former channel of the Brahmaputra River.
                        • Hydrology: It receives water from the Basistha and Kalmani rivers.
                      • Nomenclature: Beel is an Assamese local word which means ‘lake’, and the name Deepor Beel means the ‘lake of elephants’.
                        • Area: It covers an area of 4.1 sq.km. It is considered one of the biggest lakes of the Brahmaputra Valley of Lower Assam.
                      • Boundaries: It is surrounded by steep highlands on the northern and southern sides.
                        • Outflow: The lake’s outflow is the Khandajan rivulet, which joins the Brahmaputra.
                      • Significance: It is the only major stormwater storage basin for the city of Guwahati. 
                        • Uniqueness: It was recognised as a Ramsar Site in 2002 and as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) in 2004. It is the only Ramsar site in the state of Assam.
                      • Important for migratory birds: This lake is a staging site on migratory flyways, and some of the largest concentrations of aquatic birds in Assam can be seen, especially in winter. Some globally threatened birds are supported, including Spot-billed Pelican, Lesser Greater Adjutant Stork, and Baer’s Pochard.
                      • Habitat of Asian elephants: The Rani and Garbhanga hills, the habitat of the Asiatic elephants on the southern side of the beel, are part of this ecosystem.
                      • Livelihood: About 50 fish species and aquatic resources provide livelihood support to about 1,200 households residing in about 12 villages on the fringes of the wetland.
                      • Concerns: The Boragaon/Pamohi dumping site near the wetland’s edge continues to be a major source of toxic leachates and heavy metal contamination. Rapid urbanisation and land reclamation have reduced the wetland’s original area by approximately 35% since the late 1980s.

                      Source:


(MAINS Focus)


The Erosion of Parliamentary Majesty: Confrontation vs. Deliberation in the Indian Legislature

Subject: Polity (Parliamentary Functioning)
Sub-Topic: Decline of Parliamentary Ethos and Executive-Legislature Relations

 

Introduction

The Indian Parliament, conceived as the supreme forum for deliberation, accountability, and representation, is witnessing a troubling decline in its functional efficacy. The recent political showdown over the attempt to remove the Lok Sabha Speaker, triggered by allegations of partisan conduct, epitomizes the deep chasm between the ruling government and the Opposition. 

This discord transcends routine political rivalry, striking at the very foundation of democratic accountability and transforming the legislature from a deliberative body into a platform for political partisanship.

Background: The Immediate Flashpoint

  • Trigger Event: The Opposition moved a resolution under Article 94(c) of the Constitution for the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, which was rejected by a voice vote.
  • Immediate Cause: The move was precipitated by the Speaker’s statement claiming “confidential knowledge” that Congress women MPs might stage a protest against the Prime Minister on the House floor. This was perceived as the Speaker taking sides, compromising his constitutional mandate of neutrality.
  • Precedent: This follows a similar 2024 Opposition resolution against Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, indicating a recurring trend of the Chair being dragged into political conflict.

Key Issues and Flaws in Parliamentary Functioning

The editorial highlights systemic failures that have crippled the Lok Sabha:

  1. Partisan Conduct of the Chair:
    • The Speaker’s role, as per Kashyap’s commentary on parliamentary procedures, is to be the guardian of the House’s privilege and impartiality. The alleged threat to use confidential information against specific MPs violates this neutrality.
    • The selective disallowance of quotes (e.g., stopping Rahul Gandhi from citing former Army Chief M.M. Naravane’s memoir on the 2020 standoff) stifles substantive debate on national security.
  2. Denial of Voice to the Opposition:
    • Microphone Culture: The frequent switching off of Opposition MPs’ mics during debates symbolizes a physical denial of the right to speech.
    • Disruption of Debates: The instance of the Leader of the Opposition being interrupted 20 times during the Motion of Thanks to the President’s Address underscores a lack of basic decorum and respect for democratic dialogue.
    • Issue Suppression: Blocking discussions on critical issues like the Gautam Adani investigation by U.S. agencies and the EU-U.S. trade deal prevents parliamentary scrutiny of executive actions.
  3. Erosion of Accountability Mechanisms:
    • Question Hour and Zero Hour: While the government cited statistics (56% Zero Hour time for Opposition, more supplementary questions for them), the quality of engagement is being replaced by quantitative metrics. The core purpose—holding the executive accountable—is lost when questions are not answered satisfactorily or when debates are curtailed.
    • Rule of Procedure: The Speaker’s unchecked power to disallow questions or mentions under the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business is being used in a manner perceived as partisan.

Analysis: The Structural Decline

  • From Deliberation to Declaration: The legislature is increasingly becoming a platform for the ruling majority to showcase achievements (e.g., Amit Shah citing high productivity and debates in 14 languages) rather than a space for critical policy scrutiny.
  • Majoritarianism vs. Democracy: Single-party dominance has eroded the consensual and informal mechanisms of parliamentary democracy. The N.R. Madhava Menon Committee on parliamentary reforms had emphasized the need for a consensus-driven approach, which is currently missing.
  • Weaponization of Procedures: Both the ruling party and the Opposition are guilty of using rules not for facilitating business, but for political grandstanding. The frequent adjournments, walkouts, and protests have become tools to delegitimize the other side, making the House ungovernable.
  • Impact on Federalism: A dysfunctional Parliament fails to serve as a forum for states to voice their concerns, thereby weakening the federal fabric.

The Way Forward: Restoring the Majesty of Parliament

  1. Neutrality of the Speaker: By convention and constitutional intent, the Speaker must resign from their party before assuming office to ensure absolute impartiality. This convention needs to be revived.
  2. Reforms in Rules: The Rules Committee should consider amendments that prevent the arbitrary shutting down of mics and ensure equitable allocation of time for discussion on matters of urgent public importance.
  3. Adherence to the Rule of Law: The government must facilitate the functioning of Parliament as per the mandate of Article 118, which allows each house to make rules for regulating its procedure. These rules must be followed in spirit, not just letter.
  4. Consensus Building: Drawing from the Vohra Committee Report on internal security, a similar high-level committee on parliamentary reforms could be constituted to build a political consensus on minimum standards of conduct.

Conclusion

The current trajectory of Indian Parliament, marked by performative confrontation and executive overreach, poses a grave risk to the health of the republic. While the treasury benches must shed their majoritarian arrogance and facilitate genuine debate, the Opposition must transition from being merely obstructionist to being a constructive watchdog. Restoring the majesty of Parliament requires a collective commitment to the ideals of the Constituent Assembly, where the ultimate goal is not the victory of a party, but the strengthening of democratic accountability.

 

UPSC Mains Analytical Question

  1. The office of the Speaker is the cornerstone of parliamentary democracy, yet it is increasingly being dragged into political controversies. Analyze the factors eroding the neutrality of the Speaker’s office in India and suggest measures to restore its institutional integrity.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/house-decorum-on-the-functioning-of-parliament/article70746610.ece


The Period Leave Paradox: Balancing Biological Realities with Employment Parity

Subject: Social Justice (Women’s Empowerment) & Governance
Sub-Topic: Women and Workforce Participation, Policy Formulation

 

Introduction

The discourse on menstrual leave policies in India has reached a critical juncture, with the Supreme Court recently refusing to mandate a universal law, cautioning against unintended consequences for women’s careers. 

This debate encapsulates a fundamental policy dilemma: how to accommodate biological needs without reinforcing stereotypes that hinder women’s professional advancement. As female Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) shows promising yet fragile growth, any well-intentioned policy must be carefully calibrated to avoid becoming another barrier to women’s workforce integration.

 

Background: The Current Policy Landscape

  • Judicial Standpoint: On March 13, 2025, a Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI Surya Kant refused to entertain a PIL seeking mandatory menstrual leave for women workers and students, advocating for “voluntary” state initiatives instead.
  • Existing State Policies:
    • Odisha: Provides an additional day of monthly leave for women government employees up to age 55.
    • Kerala: Grants menstrual leave to female trainees in ITIs and universities.
    • Karnataka: Issued an order (now challenged in HC) entitling women in public and private sectors (up to 52 years) to one day’s menstrual leave monthly.
  • Global Context: Countries like Spain (2023 legislation) and Zambia have existing menstrual leave policies, though implementation challenges persist.

Key Issues and Contentions

The editorial highlights critical concerns surrounding mandatory menstrual leave:

  1. Unintended Career Consequences:
    • The Court cautioned that mandatory leave could deny women “big responsibilities” by making employers perceive them as less available or committed.
    • Risk of biological determinism—defining women by their physiological differences rather than their capabilities.
    • Potential for discrimination in hiring, promotions, and pay parity.
  2. Systemic Gender Disadvantages:
    • Women already face unequal pay and workplace discrimination. Adding mandatory leave could compound these existing barriers.
    • Private employers might be disincentivised from hiring women of reproductive age, mirroring concerns raised during maternity benefit expansions.
  3. Implementation Challenges:
    • Informal Sector Reality: With majority of women workers in unorganised sectors, enforceability remains questionable.
    • Economic Compulsions: Many women cannot afford to lose workdays, making paid leave irrelevant or counterproductive.
    • Global Evidence: Spain’s “historic” 2023 policy saw low uptake after one year; Zambia reported misuse by some women.

Analysis: Balancing Welfare with Workforce Participation

  • The LFPR Context: India’s female LFPR rose from 23.3% (2017-18) to 41.7% (2023-24), but this increase is driven largely by rural women entering work due to distress, insecure employment, and unpaid household work—not necessarily formal sector empowerment.
  • Maternity Benefit Analogy: The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, while progressive, led to concerns about employability of women. The Standing Committee on Labour (2017) had recommended addressing such unintended consequences.
  • Medical Necessity vs. Universal Application: Conditions like endometriosis, PCOD, and PCOS cause debilitating pain for many women, requiring genuine accommodation. However, a one-size-fits-all approach ignores varying individual experiences.
  • Policy Design Principles: The NITI Aayog and Ministry of Women and Child Development must balance positive discrimination (accommodating biological needs) with merit-based parity (ensuring equal opportunities).

The Way Forward: A Nuanced Approach

  1. Stakeholder Consultation: As suggested by the Supreme Court (and reiterated in 2024), the government must develop policy through tripartite consultations involving employers, workers, and women’s rights groups.
  2. Alternative Measures:
    • Provision of free sanitary products and medicines at workplaces.
    • Allowing time off under existing sick leave or casual leave provisions rather than creating separate “period leave” category.
    • Flexible work arrangements during severe discomfort.
  3. Phased Implementation: Begin with voluntary adoption in government sectors, study impacts, and gradually extend based on evidence.
  4. Complementary Safeguards: Strengthen anti-discrimination laws to ensure such policies don’t become hiring barriers. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 framework could be expanded to cover menstrual-related discrimination.
  5. Awareness and Sensitisation: Address workplace stigma through gender sensitisation programmes for all employees.

Conclusion

The menstrual leave debate reflects the complex interplay between welfare provisions and workforce participation. While acknowledging biological realities is essential, policies must be crafted to empower rather than inadvertently marginalise women. A calibrated approach—combining existing leave provisions with workplace facilities, voluntary state initiatives, and robust anti-discrimination safeguards—offers the most balanced path forward. The ultimate goal remains expanding women’s choices and opportunities, not constricting them through well-intentioned but counterproductive mandates.

 

UPSC Mains Analytical Question

  1. “The debate over mandatory menstrual leave encapsulates the tension between special provisions for women and the goal of equal workforce participation.” Critically examine this statement in the context of India’s rising female Labour Force Participation Rate and the challenges of policy formulation for women’s welfare.

 

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/another-barrier-on-the-issue-of-period-leave/article70746642.ece