Category: Polity and Governance
Context:

About Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA):
Source:
Category: International Organisations
Context:

About United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP):
Source:
Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Megamalai Wildlife Sanctuary:
Source:
Category: Miscellaneous
Context:

About Jnanpith Award:
Source:
Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Dimethyl Ether (DME):
Source:
Subject: Polity (Fundamental Rights) & Social Justice (Health)
Sub-Topic: Right to Life, Euthanasia, and Patient Autonomy
Introduction
The intersection of medical technology, constitutional morality, and human compassion has found its most profound expression in the Supreme Court’s recent affirmation of the right to die with dignity. By permitting withdrawal of life support from a patient in persistent vegetative state, the Court has expanded Article 21’s canopy to encompass not merely a life of dignity, but also a dignified death. This judgment navigates the delicate balance between preserving life and preventing technological prolongation of indignity.
Background: The Evolutionary Trajectory
Judicial Precedents: A Gradual Unfolding
| Case | Year | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Smt. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab | 1996 | Distinguished between euthanasia and suicide; held right to die not fundamental under Article 21 |
| Aruna Shanbaug Petition | 2011 | Laid down guidelines for passive euthanasia; allowed withdrawal of life support with high court approval |
| Common Cause v. Union of India | 2018 | Constitution Bench held right to die with dignity a fundamental right; recognised living wills |
| Harish Rana Case | 2025 | Approved withdrawal of artificial nutrition/hydration; reinforced compassionate end-of-life care |
Key Issues and Ethical Dimensions
Analysis: Constitutional and Social Implications
The Way Forward: Operationalising the Right
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s affirmation of the right to die with dignity represents constitutional morality at its most humane. By recognising that life’s quality matters as much as its quantity, the judgment liberates terminally ill patients and their families from medically prolonged suffering. As technology advances, this framework ensures that human dignity remains paramount. The path ahead lies in translating judicial wisdom into accessible legislative frameworks and widespread societal awareness.
UPSC Mains Analytical Question
Subject: Social Justice (Education & Health) & Society
Sub-Topic: Role of Education in Social Empowerment, Mental Health, and Inclusivity
Introduction
Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) extends far beyond biological instruction, encompassing mental well-being, consent, pleasure, and respect for diversity. In India, deeply ingrained stigmas silence conversations on intimacy, exacerbating mental health crises and marginalising LGBTQ+ communities.
With the Supreme Court in 2024-25 emphasising CSE and transgender-inclusive curricula, higher education faces an urgent imperative: to transform classrooms into safe, compassionate spaces that equip students to navigate contemporary challenges and build an equitable society.
Background: The Emerging Mandate
Key Issues and Deficits in Academia
Analysis: The Mental Health-Sexuality Nexus
The Way Forward: Building Compassionate Learning Environments
Conclusion
Comprehensive Sexuality Education is not merely about biological instruction but about nurturing empathetic, critically aware citizens capable of respecting diversity. In an era of rising mental health crises and anti-democratic backlash, Indian academia must transcend silence and stigma. By integrating CSE into curricula and fostering compassionate classrooms, educational institutions can fulfil their constitutional mandate of creating an inclusive, equitable, and just society—where every student’s lived reality finds acknowledgment and support.
UPSC Mains Analytical Question
Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/importance-of-sex-education-in-academia/article70751393.ece