(UPSC GS Paper III – Science & Technology: Indigenisation of Technology; Electronics and IT)
Context (Introduction) India’s launch of the DHRUV64 microprocessor marks a significant step in reducing dependence on imported semiconductor designs, strengthening strategic autonomy, supply-chain resilience, and long-term technological self-reliance in the electronics and industrial automation sectors.
Progress and Rationale Behind DHRUV64
- Indigenous Development Milestone: DHRUV64 is a fully indigenous 64-bit, dual-core microprocessor developed by C-DAC under MeitY’s Microprocessor Development Programme, reflecting sustained public investment in core computing technologies.
- Strategic Imperative: India is a major global consumer of chips but lacks control over processor IP, toolchains, and update pathways. Indigenous processors enhance security against export controls and geopolitical supply shocks.
- Targeted Use-Cases: With a 1 GHz clock speed, DHRUV64 is designed for telecom base stations, industrial controllers, routers, and automotive modules, where reliability and integration matter more than peak consumer performance.
- Ecosystem-Oriented Approach: MeitY positions DHRUV64 as a platform for startups, academia, and industry to prototype systems without reliance on foreign processors, recognising that processors succeed only with strong software–hardware ecosystems.
- Alignment with Open Standards: The chip is tied to the Digital India RISC-V (DIR-V) programme, leveraging open instruction sets to avoid licence dependencies and encourage modular, customisable designs.
India’s Broader Processor Ecosystem
- SHAKTI (IIT Madras): RISC-V–based processors focused on academic research, secure computing, and commercial deployment; supported under the National Mission on Interdisciplinary Cyber-Physical Systems.
- AJIT (IIT Bombay): Designed primarily for strategic and defence applications, emphasising reliability and deterministic performance.
- VIKRAM (ISRO–SCL): Radiation-hardened processors for spaceflight systems, underscoring India’s niche strengths in mission-critical electronics.
- THEJAS32/64 (C-DAC): Earlier DIR-V chips, with THEJAS64 fabricated at SCL Mohali, demonstrating incremental progress in domestic fabrication capabilities.
- Ecosystem Logic: Together, these processors cater to diverse needs—space, defence, industrial control, and embedded systems—indicating a portfolio-based strategy rather than a single “flagship” chip.
Key Information Gaps and Criticisms
- Lack of Performance Transparency: MeitY has not released benchmarks, cache architecture, memory controller details, I/O capabilities, or performance-per-watt metrics—critical for industrial and OEM adoption.
- Unclear Fabrication Details: The foundry, process node, yields, packaging, and reliability standards have not been disclosed, raising questions for telecom and automotive lifecycle requirements.
- Ambiguity of ‘Fully Indigenous’: It is unclear whether indigeneity refers only to instruction set usage or extends to microarchitecture, system-on-chip integration, toolchains, fabrication, and ownership of critical IP blocks.
- OEM Adoption Uncertainty: There is no clarity on developer boards, supported operating systems, security audits, or government-led anchor procurement to de-risk early adoption.
- Roadmap Risks: While DHANUSH (1.2 GHz, quad-core, ~28 nm) and DHANUSH+ (2 GHz, quad-core, ~14–16 nm) are announced, timelines and manufacturing readiness remain uncertain.
Government Schemes Supporting Indigenous Semiconductor Progress
- Chips to Startup Programme: ₹250 crore over five years to build skilled manpower and startup participation in chip design.
- Design Linked Incentive (DLI) Scheme: Financial incentives for domestic semiconductor design companies to reduce entry barriers and encourage innovation.
- INUP-i2i Initiative: Provides academic and startup access to national nanofabrication and characterisation facilities.
- India Semiconductor Mission (ISM): As of 2025, approved 10 projects across six States with investments of about ₹1.6 lakh crore, focusing on fabs, ATMP units, and ecosystem development.
- Strategic Focus Shift: From isolated chip launches towards system-on-chip families, reference designs, and integrated manufacturing–testing capacity.
Conclusion
DHRUV64 represents incremental but meaningful progress in India’s semiconductor journey. However, sustained success depends on transparency, ecosystem maturity, anchor demand, and scalable manufacturing—transforming indigenous processors from symbolic achievements into commercially and strategically viable technologies.
Mains Question
- Assess the significance of the DHRUV64 microprocessor in advancing India’s indigenous semiconductor ecosystem. What challenges must India overcome to translate such initiatives into sustainable technological self-reliance?(250 words, 15 marks)
Source : The Hindu