Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD):
Source:
Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Bhitarkanika National Park:
Source:
Category: Government Schemes
Context:

About Atal Pension Yojana:
Source:
Category: Miscellaneous
Context:

About Kaladi:
Source:
Category: Geography
Context:
About Muna Island:
Source:
GS-III: “Environment: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment.”
Context (Introduction)
The Himalayan region witnessed near-continuous climate shocks in 2025, with over 4,000 climate-related deaths across India. Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand were among the worst affected, with towns such as Dharali, Harsil, Uttarkashi, Chamoli, Kullu, Mandi and Kishtwar devastated by cloudbursts, landslides, avalanches and flash floods.
Despite this, large infrastructure projects, particularly the Char Dham road-widening project, continue to be pushed in highly disaster-prone ecological zones, signalling a dangerous policy disconnect.
Core Issue:
The Himalayas are one of the world’s most climate-sensitive landscapes, warming ~50% faster than the global average (IPCC-linked studies).
Yet, development interventions are being pursued through:
This has triggered a feedback loop of land instability + climate amplification, raising the risk of an “ecocide-like scenario” in the Himalayas.
Ecological Importance of Devdar (Deodar) Forests
Devdar forests are not symbolic assets but critical ecological infrastructure:
Key ecological functions
Policy Failure: Char Dham Road Project as a Case Study
Structural flaws
Consequences
Climate Change as a Risk Multiplier
Climate change is not the root cause but a risk amplifier:
This makes infrastructure-led fragility far more lethal.
Institutional and Governance Gaps
Why This Matters
Way Forward
Conclusion
The Himalayas are not a development frontier to be conquered, but a living ecological system that sustains the subcontinent. Pursuing infrastructure-first policies in disaster zones, under accelerating climate stress, represents scientific, ecological and governance failure.
“Without the Himalayas, there is no India.” Sustainable development here is not ideological restraint but ecological necessity.
Mains Question
GS-II: “Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests; Important international institutions, agencies and fora their structure, mandate.”
Context (Introduction)
The return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency (Trump 2.0) has accelerated a structural shift in the international system. Trump’s success is not merely personal but systemic—enabled by other leaders mimicking his style, normalising unilateralism, strategic denial, and transactional nationalism, thereby weakening the post-war liberal international order.
Core Argument
Trump is redefining the rules of the international system by normalising unilateral territorial revisionism and strategic denial, lowering the threshold for confrontation globally. More dangerously, other leaders emulating “Trumpian” behaviour (“little Trumps”) amplify systemic instability, making global resistance fragmented and ineffective.
Why This Matters for India
India faces similar constraints as Europe:
Way Forward: India’s Strategic Response
Conclusion
Trump’s resurgence reveals a deeper global malaise: leaders increasingly prefer spectacle over stability and coercion over consensus. The danger lies not in one disruptor, but in the multiplication of disruptors. For India, the task is neither resistance nor submission, but strategic sobriety—defending norms where possible, hedging where necessary, and preparing for a world where power tests limits more often than rules restrain it.
Mains Question