Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Madras Hedgehog:
Source:
Category: Polity and Governance
Context:

About National Voters’ Day (NVD):
Source:
Category: Miscellaneous
Context:

About ASC Arjun:
Source:
Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Forever Chemicals:
Source:
Category: Geography
Context:

About Gandak River:
Source:
GS-II: India and its relations with other countries; international institutions, global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.
GS-III: Awareness in the fields of Information Technology, Computers; cyber security; issues relating to intellectual property rights
Context (Introduction)
Cybercrime has emerged as a transnational threat cutting across national security, economic stability, democratic rights, and data sovereignty. In December 2024, the UN General Assembly adopted the UN Convention against Cybercrime, the first global criminal justice instrument in over two decades. However, India, the U.S., Japan, and Canada did not sign, exposing deep fractures in global cyber governance and highlighting a wider crisis of multilateralism.
Core Issue
The debate around the UN Cybercrime Convention reflects a principle–practice divide in international law, where consensus on abstract norms masks sharp divergence in implementation, especially concerning:
This fragmentation is occurring amid a shift from rule-based multilateralism to polycentrism, where governance increasingly relies on smaller, issue-based coalitions.
Key Developments
Challenges Exposed
Why This Matters for India
Way Forward
At the Global Level
At the National Level
Strategic Approach
Conclusion
Cybercrime governance today mirrors the wider global governance crisis—fragmented authority, contested norms, and weakened institutions. For India, the challenge is not merely whether to sign a convention, but whether it can shape the evolving cyber order without surrendering institutional autonomy or democratic values. The shift to polycentrism is unavoidable, but without strategic capacity-building, it risks deepening inequality and instability in cyberspace governance.
Mains Question
GS-II: “India and its relations with other countries; effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests.”
GS-III: “Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilisation of resources, growth, development and employment.”
Context (Introduction)
The erosion of the rules-based global economic order marked by US policy unpredictability, Chinese excess capacity, weakening multilateralism, and rising protectionism—has altered the external environment facing India. While near-term indicators suggest a cyclical recovery in India’s economy in 2026, however, cyclical tailwinds are insufficient in a structurally volatile global system. Only deep domestic reforms can provide durable economic insulation.
Core Idea
Cyclical growth impulses vs structural growth capacity:
Key Economic Signals Highlighted
Structural Challenges Identified
Why It Matters for India
Way Forward
Conclusion
As the rules-based global order weakens, India cannot rely on external stability or short-term macro tailwinds. Cyclical recovery may provide breathing space, but only sustained structural reforms—in investment, labour markets, productivity, and institutional credibility—can shield the economy from global volatility. In a fragmented world, domestic reform becomes the first line of economic defence.
Mains Question