Urban Planning in India must move beyond Land-use towards Sustainable and Resilient Growth
(GS Paper III: Urban Development, Infrastructure, and Environment)
Context (Introduction)
India’s Viksit Bharat @2047 vision of a $30-trillion economy hinges on cities that are productive, resilient, and sustainable. However, urban planning in India largely remains limited to land-use zoning, neglecting economic potential, environmental sustainability, and inclusive urban governance.
Main Arguments
- Economic Vision as the Foundation of Planning: Urban planning must begin with an economic growth strategy, identifying future employment sectors, industrial corridors, and skill clusters.
- The UN-Habitat’s New Urban Agenda advocates aligning spatial plans with economic priorities to transform cities into growth engines. For instance, Ahmedabad’s Town Planning Schemes link land readjustment to infrastructure-driven industrial expansion, demonstrating this integration in practice.
- Integrated Systems Planning: Cities function as interlinked systems — housing, mobility, energy, waste, and water.
- Planning must, therefore, move beyond static zoning to systems-based urban design, aligning with SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. Integrated land, water, and energy plans can prevent resource stress and improve resilience to shocks such as floods or droughts.
- Natural Resource and Climate Budgeting: Urban growth must be guided by resource budgeting—evaluating available water, green cover, and waste-handling capacity.
- The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2nd ARC) and the National Mission on Sustainable Habitat recommend integrating disaster resilience and climate adaptation into every urban plan, ensuring no city expands beyond its ecological carrying capacity.
- Environmental and Mobility Integration: Cities contribute about 70% of India’s carbon emissions and face severe air quality crises. Each city plan must include an Air Pollution Management and Mobility Plan, promoting mass transport, non-motorised modes, and electrification.
- The Delhi Metro is an effective model—integrating land-use, transport, and emission reduction, helping avoid nearly 4.8 million tonnes of CO₂ annually (CSE, 2024).
- Regional and Polycentric Urbanisation: Urbanisation now extends to peri-urban belts and smaller towns. UN-Habitat and India’s National Urban Policy Framework (NUPF) emphasise polycentric growth—developing multiple city clusters instead of one mega-city focus.
- The Delhi–Meerut–Ghaziabad corridor under the Regional Rapid Transit System (RRTS) exemplifies such a regional planning model connecting jobs, transport, and housing across jurisdictions.
Criticisms and Drawbacks
- Outdated legal framework: Urban planning acts still rely on 20th-century zoning logic, unsuited to fast urbanisation.
- Weak coordination: Multiplicity of agencies leads to fragmented planning, violating the “one city–one plan” principle.
- Neglect of informality: Over 80% of India’s urban workers are informal, yet livelihood zones remain unplanned.
- Limited environmental integration: Air, water, and waste management are peripheral rather than integral planning goals.
- Boundary constraints: Planning stops at municipal limits, excluding fast-growing peri-urban regions.
Reforms and Policy Directions
- Legislative Modernisation: Revise the Town and Country Planning Acts to include economic, environmental, and social parameters, adopting performance-based planning instead of rigid zoning.
- Economic and Resource-linked Planning: Make City Economic Strategies mandatory precursors to Master Plans—linking job forecasts, GDP potential, and carrying-capacity assessments.
- Integrated Metropolitan Governance: Create unified Metropolitan Planning Authorities with fiscal autonomy and accountability, as suggested by the 2nd ARC, to ensure cohesive planning across agencies.
- Climate and Environmental Accountability: Institutionalise City Climate Action Plans, Carbon Budgets, and Air Quality Cells to operationalise India’s net-zero 2070 roadmap and meet Paris Agreement commitments.
- Data, Education, and Local Capacity: Modernise urban education through GIS-enabled, sustainability-focused curricula. Planners must be trained in digital mapping, environmental auditing, and participatory planning, as encouraged by UN-Habitat’s Capacity Development Framework.
| Model Example: Surat City Resilience Model
Surat, once prone to floods and epidemics, is now cited globally (by UN-Habitat) as a Resilient City Model. Through Surat Urban Development Authority (SUDA) and the 100 Resilient Cities initiative, the city integrated flood forecasting, solid waste management, and early warning systems into its planning. This demonstrates how multi-sectoral, adaptive planning can convert vulnerability into resilience — a template for other Indian cities.
|
Conclusion
India’s urban future must transcend land-use rigidity and embrace strategic, data-driven, and climate-conscious urbanism. By linking planning to economic growth, sustainability metrics, and resilient governance, India can build cities that power inclusive development while meeting its climate and social justice obligations — truly realising the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047.
Mains Question
- Urban planning in India is overly focused on land-use regulation and ignores its economic and ecological dimensions. Discuss with examples how Indian cities can adopt integrated and resilience-based planning models to achieve sustainable urban growth. (250 words, 15 marks)
Source: The Indian Express