Category: Science and Technology
Context:

About Biomaterials:
Source:
Category: Economy
Context:

About Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC):
Source:
Category: History and Culture
Context:

About Somnath Temple:
Source:
Category: Environment and Ecology
Context:

About Olive Ridley Sea Turtles:
Source:
Category: Defence and Security
Context:

About Suryastra Rocket Launcher System:
Source:
GS-II: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health.
Context (Introduction)
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of India’s most serious public health challenges. The Prime Minister’s reference to AMR in the December 2025 Mann Ki Baat broadcast marks a rare moment of political signalling on the issue. This intervention has the potential to mainstream AMR as a public concern, but awareness alone will be insufficient without systemic strengthening of surveillance and governance.
Core Idea
AMR occurs when microorganisms evolve resistance to antibiotics due to their irrational and excessive use. In India, AMR has expanded beyond hospitals into communities, agriculture, and the environment, demanding a comprehensive One Health approach that integrates human, animal, and environmental health systems.
Problem Diagnosis: Gaps in India’s AMR Response
Why It Matters
Way Forward
Conclusion
Political acknowledgement of AMR is a necessary first step, but India’s real challenge lies in fine-tuning surveillance, regulation, and enforcement. Without representative data and systemic integration, AMR will continue to outpace policy responses. A strengthened, inclusive surveillance architecture is essential to convert awareness into effective national action against one of the gravest health threats of the 21st century.
Mains Question
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is no longer a confined clinical issue but a systemic public health and governance challenge. Examine the major gaps in India’s response to AMR and discuss how strengthening surveillance and adopting a One Health approach can improve health outcomes. (250 words, 15 marks)
GS-II: Government policies and interventions and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
GS-III: Various Security forces and agencies and their mandate; Challenges to internal security through communication networks and role of technology.
Context (Introduction)
India’s experience with terrorism, particularly the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, exposed serious intelligence coordination failures. In response, the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) was conceived as a technological solution to aggregate scattered datasets for counter-terrorism. However, NATGRID’s evolution from a limited intelligence-sharing tool into a vast analytics-driven surveillance architecture raises serious constitutional, governance, and security concerns.
Core Idea
NATGRID was originally envisaged as a middleware platform enabling authorised agencies to query multiple databases to prevent intelligence failures. Its contemporary expansion—marked by large-scale data access, integration with the National Population Register (NPR), and algorithmic analytics signals a shift from targeted intelligence to population-scale surveillance, blurring the line between national security and everyday policing.
Problem Diagnosis: Governance and Security Risks
Why It Matters
Way Forward: Rebalancing Security and Liberty
Conclusion
The trauma of 26/11 continues to shape India’s security imagination, but the response risks overshooting the constitutional balance. Without statutory grounding, independent oversight, and proportional use, NATGRID risks becoming an infrastructure of digital authoritarianism rather than a tool of effective security. True prevention lies not in omnipresent surveillance, but in accountable intelligence systems rooted in constitutional values.
Mains Question