Part of: Mains GS Paper I- Social Issues
Key pointers:
About the survey:
Article link: Click here
Part of: Mains GS Paper II- Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
Key pointers:
Article link: Click here
Part of: Mains GS Paper I- Science & Technology
Key pointers:
Article link: Click here
TOPIC: General Studies 2:
- Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
- Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources.
- Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes
Introduction:
Free and compulsory education of children in the 6 to 14 age group in India became a fundamental right when, in 2002, Article 21-A was inserted in the 86th Amendment to the Constitution. The enforcing legislation came eight years later, as the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2010, or the RTE Act. There are clauses in the Act which have enormous catalytic potential but that have gone largely untouched and unnoticed.
A focus on three of the provisions of the RTE Act can result in an immediate and discernible impact. The three provisions are:
Focusing on retention:
The Act envisages that the state, i.e. State governments and panchayats, would aggressively ensure that each child is brought into the schooling system and also “retained” for eight years. Issue:
Unfortunately, tracking dropouts and preparing and mainstreaming them into age-appropriate classes has been subsumed into existing scheme activities. Even seven years after its enactment, there are still children on the streets, in fields and in homes. The problem now is more about dropouts than children who were never enrolled.
Way out: Strategies to ensure retention need to change from the earlier approach of enrolling the un-enrolled. As children out of the fold of schooling are the most hard to reach, such as girls, the disabled, orphans and those from single parent families, the solutions have to be localised and contextualised.
Pupil-teacher ratio(PTR):
It is the most critical requirement. But it has got the least public attention. Importance: All other forward-looking provisions of the Act such as continuous assessment, a child learning at her own pace, and ‘no detention’ policy are contingent on a school with an adequate number of teachers. No meaningful teaching-learning is possible unless trained teachers are physically present at school. It is impractical to expect quality education without this. Issue: According to the Education Department’s data, under the Unified District Information System for Education (U-DISE) database 2015-16, 33% of the schools in the country did not have the requisite number of teachers, as prescribed in the RTE norms. RTE Act prescribes a PTR of 40:1 and 35:1 at primary and upper primary level, respectively in every school. The percentage of schools that were PTR-compliant varied from 100% in Lakshadweep to 16.67% in Bihar. Way out: Teacher provisioning should be the first option to fund as no educationally developed country has built up a sound schooling foundation without a professionally-motivated teaching cadre in place. In States with an adequate overall number of teachers, their positioning or posting requires rationalisation according to the number of students.
Decentralisation of academic schedules:
Another provision in RTE is that the academic calendar will be decided by the local authority, which, for most States and Union Territories, is the panchayat.
Importance:
This provision recognises the vast cultural and regional diversities within the country such as local festivals, sowing and harvesting seasons, and even natural calamities as a result of which schools do not function academically. It is socially acceptable that priority will be given to such a local event and not schooling. Not all festivals and State holidays declared by the the State headquarters may be locally relevant. So, if panchayats, perhaps at the district level, decide the working days and holidays, this would not only exponentially increase attendance and teaching-learning but also strengthen local panchayats, being closest to the field, to take ownership of their schools. They would be responsible in ensuring the functioning of the prescribed instruction days.
The RTE Act is a game-changer in that it establishes that the onus to ensure free and compulsory education lies on the state. However, the ‘compulsory’ and ‘state liability’ part needs to be imbibed by the educational bureaucracy, which is now lacking.
Conclusion:
A law is as good or as bad as its implementation. It is unfair to blame legislation alone for the sad state of affairs without implementing it in full measure, especially its enabling provisions. Open-minded adoption of the above-mentioned provisions, keeping the child in mind, can go a long way in radically transforming our school education sector.
Connecting the dots:
The road still runs through Ramallah
A needless pursuit
A nation builder, an inspiration
Health warning
An opaque justice
A global opportunity for the Indian workforce