Part of: Main GS Paper III - Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, growth, development, investment.
The latest RBI figures reveal that the number of ATMs in rural areas has shrunk by a little over 1,000 in past one year. India’s rural areas were the worst hit during demonetisation. The RBI’s remonetisation drive has not resolved the cash supply to ATMs in rural areas, forcing the shutdown of many ATMs.
Issue:
White-label ATMs
Article link: Click here
Part of: Main GS Paper II - Social issue, Welfare, government schemes and policies.
Key PT pointers:
Central focus:
Article link: Click here
Part of: Main GS Paper II - Social issue, Welfare, Women empowerment, government schemes and policies.
Key pointers:
Note: Above points can be mentioned while writing an essay on topics related to cybersecurity.
Article link: Click here
Part of: Main GS Paper II - Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation
Key PT pointers:
Central focus:
Article link: Click here
Part of: Main GS Paper III - Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, growth, development, investment.
President recently gave his assent to the ordinance approved by the Union Cabinet to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to strengthen the regime.
Key pointers:
Article link: Click here
TOPIC: General studies 2:
- Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests
- Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests, Indian diaspora
- Important International institutions
Introduction:
Comparing SAARC with ASEAN we can notice that ASEAN is much more effective regional organization.
ASEAN is a good example for SAARC, particularly for India and Pakistan, to realise the value of cooperation and benefits resulting from a larger common market despite diversity in politics and religion.
(Below article compares and provides crucial inputs about the success formula of ASEAN and how ASEAN model can help SAARC to become an effective regional organization.)
History (Basics):
SAARC
ASEAN
Same but Different: (Similarities and Differences)
(Case 1) Common concerns led to their foundations
When the ASEAN was founded in 1967, its members existed in a state of mutual suspicion and uncertainty. As new nation-states, its founding members were also concerned with protecting their sovereignty and political and economic development.
Nevertheless, over time, ASEAN developed informal diplomatic mechanisms to manage their bilateral tensions. While tensions continue to flare up between neighbours, ASEAN states appear to have successfully avoided the outbreak of armed conflict between states in the region.
Similarly, when the SAARC was founded in 1985, its founding members had long running disputes with each other. However, unlike ASEAN, SAARC’s record at managing regional conflicts has not been as successful.
Both ASEAN and SAARC were set up because the members were involved in serious disputes. Perhaps ASEAN was more troubled because of its conglomeration of islands and unclear laws dealing with maritime frontiers. Yet, while ASEAN was able to avoid conflict, SAARC was not.
(Case 2) Trade and economic cooperation
ASEAN nations signed the treaty of amity and cooperation, adopted the principles of refraining or avoiding of threat or use of force and settlement of disputes by peaceful means.
The shared conviction of creating an economically win-win situation mobilised the nations in forming an interdependent regional economy. Therefore, since its inception, the ASEAN countries have become more integrated through enhanced intraregional trade and connectivity.
SAARC started its journey with similar aspirations but over time has failed to deliver. It has been unable to integrate the region through trade and connectivity and continues to be stuck in an awkward/complex mix-up of regional politics and rivalry and stagnates from historical distrust and old animosity.
(Case 3) Great potential but stalled projects
Association of Southeast Asian Nations ASEAN is among the world’s largest regional intergovernmental organisations.
Trade in ASEAN has grown rapidly and it has focussed on promoting rapid economic growth and modernisation. It has created the Comprehensive Investment Agreement (ACIA), which ensures liberalisation and protection of cross-border investments operations, together with best practices for the treatment of foreign investors and investments.
On the other hand, trade amongst the SAARC members stands at 3.5% of their total volume of trade. Initiatives under the South Asian Free Trade Association have failed to make much headway. Subregional initiatives like the Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal Motor Vehicle Agreement also have stalled.
(Case 4) Travel and Connectivity
The Federation of ASEAN Travel Associations (FATA) has called on the ASEAN nations to waive entry requirements amongst the member states.
A feasibility study has been conducted on the development of a rail link from Singapore to Kunming in southern China to enhance seamless connectivity among the ASEAN nations to boost intraregional trade and people-to-people connectivity. Projects aimed at promoting the region as a tourist destination have also been undertaken.
On the other hand, the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme only allows certain categories of dignitaries to be exempt from visas, excluding ordinary citizens from accessing unimpeded travel in the region. It is difficult for Indians to enter Pakistan and vice versa. Even citizens of other SAARC countries who have visited either India or Pakistan before and now wish to travel to the other face hassles during visa issuance by either country. And SAARC infrastructural problems plague connectivity.
(Case 5) Domination of subregional initiatives
As the biggest country of SAARC, India is trying to exert leadership by forming subregional initiatives like the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). Another objective is to isolate Pakistan. Such attempts to forge sub-regional ties at the cost of jeopardising the regional vision for unity have not been witnessed in ASEAN.
When ASEAN was criticised for taking in Myanmar in spite of its military rule, the grouping emphasised the importance of keeping open the channels of communication and engagement as a better means to influence the regime. Bilateral arguments or disagreements never got in the way of trade and travel.
(Case 6) India and Pakistan
In its first two decades, ASEAN focussed on a limited range of issues, but over time its mandate expanded and now includes climate change, disaster management, counterterrorism, drugs and human trafficking.
ASEAN’s greatest success has been its ability to deftly resolve disputes.
In the early years, for instance, its unity was challenged by the Philippines-Malaysia dispute over Sabah, but the founding members found a peaceful mechanism to mitigate opposing claims.
In the case of SAARC, political squabbles, deep mistrust and military conflict between India and Pakistan have frustrated regional cooperation. The whole region is suffering from lost potential due to India-Pakistan hostility which hit a new low when India boycotted the 19th SAARC summit as a result of the Uri terrorist attack, with Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Bhutan following suit, eventually resulting in cancellation of the summit.
(Case 7) Lack of broad regional vision
ASEAN members have avoided showing outward hostility against each other and have tried to resolve differences through dialogue, engagement and cooperation. Politicians in SAARC have mostly catered to their domestic constituents without having any broad regional vision, so that it takes years to sign agreements and even more time to implement them.
As a regional organisation, while ASEAN has grown from strength to strength. Unless there is a serious and concerted effort by the political leadership of SAARC, led primarily by India and Pakistan, to revitalise the regional body, it will continue to be what it always has been: a utopian idea existing only in summit documents.
The way ahead: (IASbaba’s views)
With abundant natural resources and more than 1.5 billion people, SAARC has the potential to become the world’s largest economy after the United States and China and is perceived as the next largest consumer market buoyed by steady economic growth and a booming middle class.
Yet, SAARC is failing to harvest the benefit with intra-SAARC trade of only 5%, compared to ASEAN’s 32%, the EU’s 50% and NAFTA’s 65%.
From regional stability and security ASEAN has now moved to regional economic integration and cooperation which is another step of their success. Neither in terms of economic co-operation nor in terms of promotion of peace and understanding there have been no signs of regional co-operation in SAARC. Because of India and Pakistan’s suspicion and mistrust of each other SAARC continues to stagnate and will never be as successful as ASEAN.
In simple words, the rivalry between India and Pakistan continues to frustrate efforts to integrate South Asia.
With the flow of multilateralism and regionalism ASEAN is going forward SAARC is still in same position and unsuccessful. SAARC member states should follow ASEAN as a model for regionalism and for the regional prospects and prosperity.
Connecting the dots:
TOPIC:General studies 2:
- Mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections.
Background:
The Maharashtra government has enacted an anti-superstition law. And another such law is in process in Karnataka.
Superstition in India:
Maharashtra:
Maharashtra has implemented the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and Other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act, 2013.
The Maharashtra legislation has stopped the act of human sacrifice. Before this law, acts involving human sacrifice could not be stopped as they were preceded by some puja and offerings — not banned under any law.
The anti-superstition law also makes it possible to curtail activities of so-called godmen before they become too powerful. A section in the legislation specifically addresses and checks claims made by ‘godmen’ who say they have supernatural powers.
Constitutional angle:
Anti-superstition law can be seen as a reasonable restriction on the right to practise and propagate one’s religion under Article 25 of the Constitution. As long as these restrictions are in the interest of public order, morality and health, the law may withstand the test of constitutionality.
A separate law is not needed:
The question of whether we need a separate law to curb superstitious practices has to be debated.
A separate law is needed:
Present IPC not equipped-
Way forward:
Conclusion:
India needs legislation on superstition. Superstitious practices that are utterly dehumanising, brutal and exploitative need to be dealt with by a law that specifically addresses them.
However, it is education and awareness that can truly liberate a society from superstition, blind faith and abominable practices in the name of faith. Until then, the law will have to continue to identify and punish acts that violate the people’s right to life, health and dignity.
Connecting the dots:
The new bipolarity in Asia
Reaching out to neighbors
The wind in India's sails
Polls apart
India's changing approach to global governance
Inequality comes to Asia
Air pollution is both a challenge and an opportunity