Part of: Mains GS Paper III- Environmental conservation
Key pointers:
Article link: Click here
Part of: Mains GS Paper II- Internal Security
Key pointers:
Article link: Click here
TOPIC:
General Studies 2:
General Studies 3:
Background:
GHG emissions from solid waste disposal as reported to the UNFCCC in 2015/16 by India increased at the rate of 3.1per cent per annum between 2000 and 2010.
GHGs:
Greenhouse gases (GHGs) create a natural blanket around the Earth’s atmosphere by preventing some of the sun’s heat energy from radiating back into space, thus keeping the Earth warm. Over the last century-and-a-half, human activities have added considerably to GHGs in the atmosphere, and that continues to result in global warming. The global warming potential of methane is 25 times as much and nitrous oxide 298 times as much as that of carbon dioxide, over the long run (100 years).
Solid waste management and GHGs:
Activities involved in the management of solid waste generate (GHGs) results into release of gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and small amounts of nitrous oxide. GHG emissions from solid waste disposal as reported to the UNFCCC in 2015/16 by India increased at the rate of 3.1per cent per annum between 2000 and 2010, and by China at 4.6per cent per annum between 2005 and 2012.
Way out:
The volume of waste sent to the landfill sites can be reduced if biodegradable waste is processed locally. Aerobic decomposition into compost:
Anaerobic decompostion:
An alternative to composting for biodegradable waste is biomethanation or anaerobic decomposition. Biomethanation generates biogas which is a substitute for fossil fuel and produces slurry which is an excellent organic fertiliser, both helping to mitigate global warming. Local processing also means that biomethanation saves on transportation. Very few Indian cities are trying biomethanation because segregation at source and feeding biodegradable waste to the plants in time remain a major challenge.
Recycling of waste:
It helps reduce GHG emissions because the energy required to manufacture a product using virgin materials is higher than when using recycled materials. While India has had a tradition of recycling paper, glass, metals, etc with the engagement of the informal sector, lack of segregation comes in the way of realising the full potential of recycling. This is particularly true for paper that soils easily when waste is mixed. Only 27 per cent of paper in India is recycled, compared with 60 per cent in Japan and 73 per cent in Germany (CPPRI, 2013). Recycling requires up to 50 per cent less energy compared to production of paper based on wood pulp, and it also saves trees from being cut.
Refuse Derived Fuel:
The non-biodegradable and non-recyclable waste other than hazardous waste (batteries, CFLs, etc), can be converted into Refuse Derived Fuel for use in high-temperature furnaces, for example, in cement kilns and power plants. Technologies are also available for controlled incineration and/or gasification for energy recovery from this waste. These are commonly referred to as “waste-to-energy” plants.
Landfills: Not a viable option If incineration is not desirable or acceptable, the solution is not simply to dump untreated mixed waste at landfill sites. Issues with landfills-
Solution:
Bioremediation offers a relatively quick and inexpensive mitigation instrument for reducing the GHG emissions from landfill sites through aerobic decomposition of organic fraction of the waste.
Lessons from other countries:
GHG emissions from solid waste have been declining in Germany and Japan. A ban on landfilling of non-pre-treated waste in Germany has led to 47 per cent of the waste being recycled, and 36 per cent incinerated. In Japan, 75 per cent of the waste is incinerated, while 21 per cent is recycled. The regulations in both countries ensure that incinerators have state-of-the-art emission control technologies, and the directly landfilled municipal solid waste is as low as one per cent.
Conclusion:
India needs to get its act together to improve its municipal solid waste management with the triple objective of resource recovery, improving public health conditions and mitigating the risks associated with human-induced global warming.
Connecting the dots:
TOPIC:
General Studies 2:
General Studies 3:
Introduction:
Farm incomes have virtually stagnated for the past four years, mostly owing to – falling prices, an output glut, large untimely imports and demonetisation.
India with a huge population dependent on agriculture for livelihood, increasing their purchasing power becomes extremely important. Because the growth of larger economy depends on economic potential and power of this group itself.
Therefore, such slow growth in farm incomes doesn’t augur well for the government’s stated objective of doubling farmer incomes by 2022.
This article deals with –
Recent Budget Measures:
Some of the Budget measures deserve applaud:
All these are a step in the right direction. However, there is need for a true solution than some of the piecemeal Band Aid-type fixes.
Concern:
The MSP has always been a political instrument. The recommendations of the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) have often been overruled in the cabinet, to accommodate the political demands of coalition partners from certain states.
The actual fiscal resource set aside for the large MSP hike is not very much. Besides, there is some lack of clarity on the base for calculating the cost of cultivation.
It is important to note that since 1950s, the farm story has been one of continuous and intrusive price and movement controls, monopoly food procurement, storage and distribution, with massive attendant leakages, with innumerable piecemeal Band Aid-type fixes.
Farming is never accorded the status of a business, to be run along capitalist principles, with unshackled economic freedom, so that the farmer can plan, sow, reap, sell and distribute as he deems best.
Most of the famers are denied direct access to consumers, to forward markets, to capital, technology and to corporate structure. And this is the basic flaw in our approach or farm policy. Farmers are not free to sell to any buyer they wish but must go through the APMC.
For example, for the past 10 years, all exports of pulses have been banned. This was presumably for food security and price stability. But this export ban has hurt farmers, who couldn’t take advantage of high prices.
Indeed, it’s in countries where bourgeois capitalism sprouted and flourished in agriculture (e.g. Japan, Switzerland) that farmers enjoy a high standard of living.
When prices of food crops go up, the Central government swings into action, clamping down on exports, bringing in zero-duty imports, imposing stocking and storage limits, and so on. But when the opposite happens, that is when prices crash, often, there is no corresponding reverse rescue. This is an example of the inherent urban bias in India’s agriculture policy, which persists to this day.
The real solution:
Export restrictions must go. Monopoly procurement must go. Essential Commodities Act restrictions must go. Arbitrary stocking limits must go.
Therefore, in order to truly unshackle the farmer and farm sector, it is important to accept the paradigm that what the farmer needs is more economic freedom, not more price and quantity controls, and cleverly designed subsidies.
For instance, removing the concept of a minimum export price for all crops is a step in that direction. It acknowledges the right of the farmer to tap into an international price, without constraint.
Doubling agricultural income by 2022 is a mammoth task but is also one that is the need of the hour. With majority of the country’s population dependant on agricultural activities, no true development can be said to be meaningful unless it incorporates the needs of this sector.
There are intense complexities and therefore, the focus of the government on this sector is much needed. The journey to double the farmers’ income is a long and very tedious but the journey has begun. The need is to ensure that the implementation in right direction by all stakeholders is uniform, effective and done whole heartedly.
Connecting the dots:
The manufacturing muddle
A roster of questions
Rethinking protectionism
A villain in paradise
Farmers need economic freedom