Posts

Daily Prelims CA Quiz

UPSC Quiz – 2025 : IASbaba’s Daily Current Affairs Quiz 26th November 2025

The Current Affairs questions are based on sources like ‘The Hindu’, ‘Indian Express’ and ‘PIB’, which are very important sources for UPSC Prelims Exam. The questions are focused on both the concepts and facts. The topics covered here are generally different from what is being covered under ‘Daily Current Affairs/Daily News Analysis (DNA) and Daily Static Quiz’ to avoid duplication. The questions would be published from Monday to Saturday before 2 PM. One should not spend more than 10 minutes on this initiative. Gear up and Make the Best Use of this initiative. Do remember that, “the difference between Ordinary and EXTRA-Ordinary is PRACTICE!!” Important Note: Don’t forget to post your marks in the comment section. Also, let us know if you enjoyed today’s test 🙂 After completing the 5 questions, click on ‘View Questions’ to check your score, time taken, and solutions. .To take the Test Click Here

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 26th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) HAMMER Weapon System Category: Defence and Security Context: Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) signed an agreement for the production of HAMMER weapon system in India. About HAMMER Weapon System: Nomenclature: HAMMER stands for Highly Agile and Manoeuvrable Munition Extended Range. It is also known as a glide bomb. Nature: It is an air-to-ground precision-guided weapon system and can be fitted to standard bombs of 250kg, 500kg, and 1,000kg weights. Development: Originally developed by Safran Electronics and Defence (SED), France, it is now set for joint manufacturing with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) in India. Range: HAMMER precision-guided munitions have a range of up to 70 km. It  Difficult to intercept: It is resistant to jamming, and capable of being launched from low altitudes over rough terrain. It is difficult to intercept and can penetrate fortified structures. Manoeuvrability: It is optimised for mountain warfare (e.g., Ladakh), allowing precision strikes even in complex topography and high-altitude environments. Uniqueness: It is a precision-guided weapon system known for its high accuracy and modular design, making it adaptable for multiple platforms, including the Rafale and Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. Significance of agreement: The development is crucial because India previously ordered this weapon system, along with other armaments, from France to equip its Rafale fighter jets in 2020 during standoff with China in eastern Ladakh. Source: The Indian Express APDIM Category: International Institutions Context: Recently, the 10th Session of the Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) took place at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi.               About APDIM: Nomenclature: APDIM stands for Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management. Nature: It is a regional institution of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  Vision: Its vision is to ensure effective disaster risk information is produced and used for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific.  Mandate: It aims to reduce human and material losses due to natural hazards and contribute to the effective design, investment and implementation of disaster risk reduction and resilience policies. Administration: It is governed by a Governing Council consisting of eight ESCAP member countries elected for a period of three years (India is one of the members for a period from 2022 to 2025). Headquarter: Its headquarters is located in Tehran, Iran. Functions: It functions as a regional facility to strengthen the science-policy interface. It also promotes effective regional cooperation, facilitates dialogue. Facilitates disaster management between countries: It facilitates the exchange of expertise, experiences, and knowledge in disaster information management between and within the countries of the region. Acts as a knowledge hub: It acts as a regional knowledge hub, consolidating and sharing disaster-related data, strengthening information systems, and supporting cooperation on transboundary hazards. Source: PIB Hayli Gubbi Volcano Category: Geography Context: The Hayli Gubbi volcano, located in Ethiopia’s Afar region for several hours after 12,000-year dormancy. About Hayli Gubbi Volcano: Location: Hayli Gubbi volcano is located in Afar, northeastern Ethiopia, within the Danakil Depression – one of the hottest and lowest places on Earth. Hotspot for seismic activity: The Afar Triple Junction, where the Red Sea Rift, Gulf of Aden Rift, and East African Rift meet, makes this region a hotspot for volcanic and seismic activity. Uniqueness: The current eruption is unique because the volcano is believed to have erupted after nearly 12,000 years, based on geological evidence from the Afar Rift. Composition of volcanic plume: The ash cloud contained a mix of volcanic ash, sulphur dioxide, glass shards, and rock fragments, transported at high altitudes between 15,000-45,000 ft. These aerosols can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks depending on wind patterns and atmospheric stability. Significance: The Hayli Gubbi eruption highlights the geological volatility of the East African Rift System (EARS) where active volcanism, fissure eruptions, and spreading ridges are common. At the junction of diverging plates: It is one of the world’s most tectonically active rift systems where the Arabian, Nubian, and Somali plates are diverging. Characterised by basaltic lava: The region is characterised by basaltic lava, fissure systems, and frequent seismic activity linked to the continental rifting process. Source: The Hindu Special Leave Petition (SLP) Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Jammu & Kashmir HC has observed that dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), does not lead to merger of the impugned order with the Supreme Court’s order. About Special Leave Petition (SLP): Definition: A SLP is a request made to the Supreme Court seeking special permission to appeal against any judgment, order, or decree from any court or tribunal (except military tribunals), even when the law does not provide a statutory right of appeal. Not a right: Special Leave Petition (SLP) is not a right—it’s a privilege granted by the Supreme Court at its discretion. It is a discretionary/optional power of the SC, and the court can refuse to grant the appeal at its discretion. Constitutional provision: Article 136 states that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, or order from any court or tribunal in India. Conditions for using SLP: It can only be exercised when a substantial question of law or gross injustice has been committed. A judgement, decree, or order need not be final for an SLP. An interim or interlocutory order or decree can also be challenged. Filed by: SLP can be filed by any aggrieved party (individual or business). government bodies, public sector undertakings or NGOs or associations (in relevant cases). Filed against: SLP can be filed against judgments from High Courts, Tribunals (except those under armed forces) or Quasi-judicial bodies. Time limit to file SLP: It can be filed against any judgment of the High Court within 90 days from the date of judgment or it can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to SC. Procedure for a SLP: A SLP must contain all the facts upon which the SC is to decide, which revolve around the grounds on which an SLP can be filed. The said petition needs to be duly signed by an Advocate-on-Record. The petitioner must include a statement within the SLP stating that no other petition has been filed in a High Court. Acceptance or rejection by SC: Once the petition is filed, the SC will hear the aggrieved party and depending upon the merits of the case, will allow the opposite party to state their part in a counter affidavit. After the hearing, if the court deems the case fit for further hearing, it will allow the same; otherwise, it will reject the appeal. Source: Live Law Bharat NCAP 2.0 Category: Government Schemes Context: India’s vehicle safety roadmap is set for a major upgrade as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has released a draft for Bharat NCAP 2.0. About Bharat NCAP: Nature: The Bharat New Car Assessment Programme (Bharat NCAP) is an indigenous star-rating system for crash testing cars, under which vehicles will be assigned between one to five stars, indicating their safety in a collision.  Partnership: It is an ambitious joint project between the Government of India (GoI) and Global NCAP, the regulatory body behind the safety crash test ratings. Launch: It was launched on 22 August 2023 and commenced on 1 October 2023. Objective: It aims to help consumers make an informed decision before purchasing a car, thereby spurring demand for safer cars. Nodal ministry: Bharat NCAP is overseen by the Ministry of Road Transport, but is an independent body. Testing protocol: Under the Bharat NCAP, cars voluntarily nominated by automobile manufacturers will be crash tested as per protocols laid down in the Automotive Industry Standard (AIS) 197. 3 safety domains: Vehicles tested under the Bharat NCAP are evaluated across three critical safety domains- adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and safety assist technologies. Applicability: Only right-hand drive passenger vehicles on sale in India and weighing less than 3,500 kg are eligible for consideration. Base variants of cars are to be tested, and ratings will be applicable for four years. Eligible vehicles: Besides internal combustion engine (ICE) models, CNG cars as well as battery-powered electric vehicles are eligible to undergo the safety test. Voluntary in nature: It is a voluntary programme under which the cost of the car for assessment for star rating and the cost of such assessment are borne by the respective vehicle manufacturer or importer. Validity: The current Bharat NCAP regulations remain valid until September 30, 2027, after which Bharat NCAP 2.0 is expected to be implemented by October 2027. About Bharat NCAP 2.0 Draft Guidelines: Based on 5 pillars: The Bharat NCAP 2.0 proposal introduces a 100-point rating system across five pillars- Crash Protection, Vulnerable Road-User Protection, Safe Driving, Accident Avoidance, and Post-Crash Safety. Use of minimum score in a rating system: From 2027-29, a 5-star rating will require 70 points, and this would rise to 80 points from 2029-31. Minimum scores will also apply across each pillar. Updated norms: It brings in fresh mandatory tests, revised scoring methods, and updated safety verticals. Uniqueness: Notably, for the first time, vehicles will be assessed on vulnerable road user protection. Expansion of crash test: The crash test will be expanded from two to five and will now have Male, female, and child dummies for testing. The cars will go through offset frontal impact, full-width frontal impact, side impact, and rear impact. Curtain airbags compulsory: Electronic stability control (ESC) and curtain airbags will be compulsory for any model seeking a star rating. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) remains optional. Source: India Today (MAINS Focus) Strengthening the POSH Act: Closing Gaps in Workplace Justice (UPSC GS Paper II – “Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions for Vulnerable Sections; Issues Relating to Women”)   Context (Introduction) A recent Chandigarh case where a college professor was dismissed following an ICC probe under the POSH Act has revived debate on low conviction rates, procedural gaps, digital-era challenges, and the Act’s inability to address informed consent and power asymmetry in academic institutions.   Main Arguments Conceptual Clarity: The Act’s focus on consent without recognising informed consent overlooks manipulation, emotional coercion, and power asymmetry in workplaces and universities. Emotional Exploitation: Emotional or psychological harassment arising from deceitful relationships remains outside the Act’s scope despite being a prominent form of abuse in hierarchical settings. Time-Barred Justice: The three-month limitation period discourages survivors who often need longer to recognise manipulation, gather evidence, and overcome fear of institutional backlash. Diluted Terminology: Referring to the accused as a “respondent” rather than “accused” symbolically downplays the gravity of sexual harassment compared to similar acts outside workplaces. Behavioural Evidence: Ambiguous definitions make ICCs rely heavily on direct evidence, ignoring circumstantial indicators or behavioural patterns that commonly characterise harassment cases.   Challenges / Criticisms  Inter-Institutional Blind Spot: The Act lacks mechanisms to address misconduct spanning multiple campuses despite frequent cross-institutional interactions in academia. Procedural Trauma: Complainants often face delays, institutional hesitation, emotional fatigue, and fear of counter-action under the “malicious complaint” clause. Digital Evidence Gaps: ICCs struggle to interpret modern digital evidence—disappearing messages, encrypted chats, single-view photos—due to lack of legal and technical training. Institutional Under preparedness: ICCs remain unevenly trained and often risk-averse, unintentionally reinforcing protection for powerful perpetrators over vulnerable complainants. Silent Serial Offenders: Absence of information-sharing or cross-institution coordination enables repeat offenders to continue exploiting multiple academic environments.   Way Forward Expand Definitions: Incorporate informed consent, emotional coercion, and digital harassment into statutory definitions to reflect contemporary realities. Extend Timelines: Increase or remove the three-month limitation period to ensure survivors are not denied justice due to delayed recognition or fear. Improve Evidence Protocols: Develop clear guidelines for handling digital evidence and expand the use of corroborative or behavioural indicators in ICC assessments. Build ICC Capacity: Mandate periodic legal, psychological, and technological training for ICC members to improve sensitivity and evidence evaluation. Inter-Institutional Mechanisms: Create a confidential national or sectoral registry enabling institutions to share information on proven offenders to prevent serial misconduct.   Conclusion The POSH Act was transformative in 2013, but evolving power structures, digital interactions, and emotional manipulation demand a stronger, clearer, survivor-centric law in 2025. Justice must be embedded in the system, not dependent on a victim’s endurance or institutional goodwill.   Mains Question  Despite being a landmark legislation, the POSH Act, 2013 faces gaps that dilute its effectiveness. Critically evaluate these challenges and suggest reforms to strengthen workplace justice for women.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu Row over DGP Appointment in Tamil Nadu: Federal Tensions in Police Reforms (UPSC GS Paper II – “Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary; Issues and Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure; Role of UPSC”)   Context (Introduction) Tamil Nadu’s inability to appoint a regular Director-General of Police before the incumbent’s retirement, rejection of the UPSC panel, and allegations of contempt of Supreme Court guidelines have reignited debates on State autonomy, police reforms, and Centre–State coordination.   Main Arguments: Why the Issue Matters Prakash Singh Mandate: The 2006 judgment mandates that States select the DGP only from a UPSC-approved panel of the three seniormost eligible IPS officers based on service length, record, and experience. Tenure Protection: The Court’s requirement of a minimum two-year fixed tenure for DGPs seeks to depoliticise police leadership and promote administrative continuity. Procedural Timeline: States must send proposals to the UPSC three months before the anticipated vacancy, a rule Tamil Nadu violated by submitting its list only a day before retirement. Autonomy vs Oversight: The State’s rejection of the UPSC panel as “unacceptable” highlights ongoing tensions between State preference and UPSC-mandated merit-based selection. Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s request for immediate appointment after UPSC recommendations underscores the judiciary’s role in enforcing police reform compliance.   Challenges / Criticisms  Delayed Compliance: Tamil Nadu’s failure to meet the three-month proposal deadline disrupted the selection process and invited judicial scrutiny. CAT Proceedings: Pending litigation before the Central Administrative Tribunal delayed the State’s actions, yet the Court held that this cannot justify procedural non-compliance. Withheld Integrity Certificate: The State withdrew integrity clearance for one officer and expressed reluctance to consider three others without transparent explanations. Panel Rejection: Tamil Nadu’s objection to the UPSC panel and request for another meeting contradicted the structured process laid down in Prakash Singh. Contempt Allegations: Appointment of an “in-charge” DGP instead of a regular one has triggered contempt petitions alleging wilful violation of Supreme Court guidelines.   Way Forward Strict Adherence: States must comply with the Prakash Singh framework to ensure transparency, stability, and depoliticisation of police leadership. Timeline Discipline: Institutionalising internal reminders and administrative protocols can prevent last-minute submissions that derail the selection process. Integrity Transparency: Clear, recorded reasons for withholding integrity certificates must be shared with the UPSC to prevent arbitrariness. Cooperative Federalism: Structured consultation between State governments and the UPSC can reduce conflict while respecting the merit-based selection process. Monitoring Mechanism: A periodic compliance audit by the Supreme Court or an independent oversight body could strengthen police reform implementation nationwide.   Conclusion The DGP appointment controversy in Tamil Nadu highlights the unresolved tension between political discretion and judicially mandated police reforms. Ensuring merit-based selection, transparent procedures, and timely coordination is essential to build a professional, independent police leadership.   Mains Question  The Prakash Singh reforms sought to depoliticise police leadership through transparent and merit-based appointments. Discuss (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Hindu Indian Constitution Beyond Western Liberalism: A Transformative Rights Vision (UPSC GS Paper II – “Indian Constitution—Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions; Comparison with Other Constitutions”)   Context (Introduction) As India marks 76 years of the Constitution’s adoption, renewed analysis highlights how its framers deliberately moved beyond Western constitutional models, designing a transformative charter that addressed social hierarchies, group rights, and structural inequalities embedded in India’s social fabric.   Why India’s Constitutional Vision Was Ahead of Its Time Transformative Equality: The Constitution expanded equality beyond Western notions by recognising caste-driven discrimination from both the state and private actors through Articles 14, 15(2), 17, and 23. Social Power Recognition: By acknowledging that power in India is wielded not only by the state but also by entrenched social groups, the Constitution mandated state action to dismantle societal hierarchies. Affirmative Action Leadership: India introduced constitutionally sanctioned reservations in 1950, a decade before U.S. civil rights reforms, making it a global pioneer in group-differentiated rights. Secular Pluralism: The Constitution adopted a nuanced secular framework—eschewing state religion, prohibiting compulsory religious taxes (Art. 27), and safeguarding individual (Art. 25) and group religious freedoms (Art. 26). Minority Cultural Rights: Through Articles 29 and 30, the Constitution empowered linguistic and religious minorities to preserve their culture and manage educational institutions, ensuring pluralist nation-building.   Challenges / Criticisms  Partial Rights Protection: Certain freedoms remained circumscribed due to colonial-era emergency provisions, allowing governments to suspend rights in broad circumstances. Executive Dominance: The Constitution created a powerful executive with sweeping discretionary powers, raising concerns about civil liberty safeguards. Uneven Pluralism: While minority and cultural protections exist, their scope has sometimes been reduced or inconsistently implemented. Debates on Group Rights: Intense Constituent Assembly debates reflected tensions between equality and differentiated protections, leaving some ambiguities unresolved. Limitations of Remedies: Judicial review exists, but access to remedies can be limited when rights are suspended under exceptional circumstances.   Deepening the Constitution’s Transformative Promise Strengthen Social Equality: Reinforce constitutional mandates against societal discrimination through stronger implementation of Articles 15(2) and 17. Balance Executive Power: Revisit emergency provisions and enhance institutional checks to prevent misuse of executive authority. Promote Pluralist Governance: Uphold minority cultural and educational rights consistently to preserve India’s pluralism in practice. Expand Rights Awareness: Enhance civic education and public literacy on constitutional rights to democratise access to justice. Safeguard Transformative Vision: Protect affirmative action and group-differentiated rights as foundational tools against structural inequality.   Conclusion India’s Constitution is not merely a legal document but a transformative project that acknowledges deep social inequalities and plural identities. Its endurance reflects a commitment to equality that respects diversity, showing that national unity and constitutional longevity emerge not from uniformity, but from inclusive recognition of difference.   Mains Question The Indian Constitution deliberately moved beyond Western liberal constitutionalism. Critically examine how this transformative vision has shaped India’s constitutional experience. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 26th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) HAMMER Weapon System Category: Defence and Security Context: Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) signed an agreement for the production of HAMMER weapon system in India. About HAMMER Weapon System: Nomenclature: HAMMER stands for Highly Agile and Manoeuvrable Munition Extended Range. It is also known as a glide bomb. Nature: It is an air-to-ground precision-guided weapon system and can be fitted to standard bombs of 250kg, 500kg, and 1,000kg weights. Development: Originally developed by Safran Electronics and Defence (SED), France, it is now set for joint manufacturing with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) in India. Range: HAMMER precision-guided munitions have a range of up to 70 km. It  Difficult to intercept: It is resistant to jamming, and capable of being launched from low altitudes over rough terrain. It is difficult to intercept and can penetrate fortified structures. Manoeuvrability: It is optimised for mountain warfare (e.g., Ladakh), allowing precision strikes even in complex topography and high-altitude environments. Uniqueness: It is a precision-guided weapon system known for its high accuracy and modular design, making it adaptable for multiple platforms, including the Rafale and Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. Significance of agreement: The development is crucial because India previously ordered this weapon system, along with other armaments, from France to equip its Rafale fighter jets in 2020 during standoff with China in eastern Ladakh. Source: The Indian Express APDIM Category: International Institutions Context: Recently, the 10th Session of the Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) took place at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi.               About APDIM: Nomenclature: APDIM stands for Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management. Nature: It is a regional institution of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  Vision: Its vision is to ensure effective disaster risk information is produced and used for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific.  Mandate: It aims to reduce human and material losses due to natural hazards and contribute to the effective design, investment and implementation of disaster risk reduction and resilience policies. Administration: It is governed by a Governing Council consisting of eight ESCAP member countries elected for a period of three years (India is one of the members for a period from 2022 to 2025). Headquarter: Its headquarters is located in Tehran, Iran. Functions: It functions as a regional facility to strengthen the science-policy interface. It also promotes effective regional cooperation, facilitates dialogue. Facilitates disaster management between countries: It facilitates the exchange of expertise, experiences, and knowledge in disaster information management between and within the countries of the region. Acts as a knowledge hub: It acts as a regional knowledge hub, consolidating and sharing disaster-related data, strengthening information systems, and supporting cooperation on transboundary hazards. Source: PIB Hayli Gubbi Volcano Category: Geography Context: The Hayli Gubbi volcano, located in Ethiopia’s Afar region for several hours after 12,000-year dormancy. About Hayli Gubbi Volcano: Location: Hayli Gubbi volcano is located in Afar, northeastern Ethiopia, within the Danakil Depression – one of the hottest and lowest places on Earth. Hotspot for seismic activity: The Afar Triple Junction, where the Red Sea Rift, Gulf of Aden Rift, and East African Rift meet, makes this region a hotspot for volcanic and seismic activity. Uniqueness: The current eruption is unique because the volcano is believed to have erupted after nearly 12,000 years, based on geological evidence from the Afar Rift. Composition of volcanic plume: The ash cloud contained a mix of volcanic ash, sulphur dioxide, glass shards, and rock fragments, transported at high altitudes between 15,000-45,000 ft. These aerosols can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks depending on wind patterns and atmospheric stability. Significance: The Hayli Gubbi eruption highlights the geological volatility of the East African Rift System (EARS) where active volcanism, fissure eruptions, and spreading ridges are common. At the junction of diverging plates: It is one of the world’s most tectonically active rift systems where the Arabian, Nubian, and Somali plates are diverging. Characterised by basaltic lava: The region is characterised by basaltic lava, fissure systems, and frequent seismic activity linked to the continental rifting process. Source: The Hindu Special Leave Petition (SLP) Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Jammu & Kashmir HC has observed that dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), does not lead to merger of the impugned order with the Supreme Court’s order. About Special Leave Petition (SLP): Definition: A SLP is a request made to the Supreme Court seeking special permission to appeal against any judgment, order, or decree from any court or tribunal (except military tribunals), even when the law does not provide a statutory right of appeal. Not a right: Special Leave Petition (SLP) is not a right—it’s a privilege granted by the Supreme Court at its discretion. It is a discretionary/optional power of the SC, and the court can refuse to grant the appeal at its discretion. Constitutional provision: Article 136 states that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, or order from any court or tribunal in India. Conditions for using SLP: It can only be exercised when a substantial question of law or gross injustice has been committed. A judgement, decree, or order need not be final for an SLP. An interim or interlocutory order or decree can also be challenged. Filed by: SLP can be filed by any aggrieved party (individual or business). government bodies, public sector undertakings or NGOs or associations (in relevant cases). Filed against: SLP can be filed against judgments from High Courts, Tribunals (except those under armed forces) or Quasi-judicial bodies. Time limit to file SLP: It can be filed against any judgment of the High Court within 90 days from the date of judgment or it can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to SC. Procedure for a SLP: A SLP must contain all the facts upon which the SC is to decide, which revolve around the grounds on which an SLP can be filed. The said petition needs to be duly signed by an Advocate-on-Record. The petitioner must include a statement within the SLP stating that no other petition has been filed in a High Court. Acceptance or rejection by SC: Once the petition is filed, the SC will hear the aggrieved party and depending upon the merits of the case, will allow the opposite party to state their part in a counter affidavit. After the hearing, if the court deems the case fit for further hearing, it will allow the same; otherwise, it will reject the appeal. Source: Live Law Bharat NCAP 2.0 Category: Government Schemes Context: India’s vehicle safety roadmap is set for a major upgrade as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has released a draft for Bharat NCAP 2.0. About Bharat NCAP: Nature: The Bharat New Car Assessment Programme (Bharat NCAP) is an indigenous star-rating system for crash testing cars, under which vehicles will be assigned between one to five stars, indicating their safety in a collision.  Partnership: It is an ambitious joint project between the Government of India (GoI) and Global NCAP, the regulatory body behind the safety crash test ratings. Launch: It was launched on 22 August 2023 and commenced on 1 October 2023. Objective: It aims to help consumers make an informed decision before purchasing a car, thereby spurring demand for safer cars. Nodal ministry: Bharat NCAP is overseen by the Ministry of Road Transport, but is an independent body. Testing protocol: Under the Bharat NCAP, cars voluntarily nominated by automobile manufacturers will be crash tested as per protocols laid down in the Automotive Industry Standard (AIS) 197. 3 safety domains: Vehicles tested under the Bharat NCAP are evaluated across three critical safety domains- adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and safety assist technologies. Applicability: Only right-hand drive passenger vehicles on sale in India and weighing less than 3,500 kg are eligible for consideration. Base variants of cars are to be tested, and ratings will be applicable for four years. Eligible vehicles: Besides internal combustion engine (ICE) models, CNG cars as well as battery-powered electric vehicles are eligible to undergo the safety test. Voluntary in nature: It is a voluntary programme under which the cost of the car for assessment for star rating and the cost of such assessment are borne by the respective vehicle manufacturer or importer. Validity: The current Bharat NCAP regulations remain valid until September 30, 2027, after which Bharat NCAP 2.0 is expected to be implemented by October 2027. About Bharat NCAP 2.0 Draft Guidelines: Based on 5 pillars: The Bharat NCAP 2.0 proposal introduces a 100-point rating system across five pillars- Crash Protection, Vulnerable Road-User Protection, Safe Driving, Accident Avoidance, and Post-Crash Safety. Use of minimum score in a rating system: From 2027-29, a 5-star rating will require 70 points, and this would rise to 80 points from 2029-31. Minimum scores will also apply across each pillar. Updated norms: It brings in fresh mandatory tests, revised scoring methods, and updated safety verticals. Uniqueness: Notably, for the first time, vehicles will be assessed on vulnerable road user protection. Expansion of crash test: The crash test will be expanded from two to five and will now have Male, female, and child dummies for testing. The cars will go through offset frontal impact, full-width frontal impact, side impact, and rear impact. Curtain airbags compulsory: Electronic stability control (ESC) and curtain airbags will be compulsory for any model seeking a star rating. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) remains optional. Source: India Today (MAINS Focus) Strengthening the POSH Act: Closing Gaps in Workplace Justice (UPSC GS Paper II – “Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions for Vulnerable Sections; Issues Relating to Women”)   Context (Introduction) A recent Chandigarh case where a college professor was dismissed following an ICC probe under the POSH Act has revived debate on low conviction rates, procedural gaps, digital-era challenges, and the Act’s inability to address informed consent and power asymmetry in academic institutions.   Main Arguments Conceptual Clarity: The Act’s focus on consent without recognising informed consent overlooks manipulation, emotional coercion, and power asymmetry in workplaces and universities. Emotional Exploitation: Emotional or psychological harassment arising from deceitful relationships remains outside the Act’s scope despite being a prominent form of abuse in hierarchical settings. Time-Barred Justice: The three-month limitation period discourages survivors who often need longer to recognise manipulation, gather evidence, and overcome fear of institutional backlash. Diluted Terminology: Referring to the accused as a “respondent” rather than “accused” symbolically downplays the gravity of sexual harassment compared to similar acts outside workplaces. Behavioural Evidence: Ambiguous definitions make ICCs rely heavily on direct evidence, ignoring circumstantial indicators or behavioural patterns that commonly characterise harassment cases.   Challenges / Criticisms  Inter-Institutional Blind Spot: The Act lacks mechanisms to address misconduct spanning multiple campuses despite frequent cross-institutional interactions in academia. Procedural Trauma: Complainants often face delays, institutional hesitation, emotional fatigue, and fear of counter-action under the “malicious complaint” clause. Digital Evidence Gaps: ICCs struggle to interpret modern digital evidence—disappearing messages, encrypted chats, single-view photos—due to lack of legal and technical training. Institutional Under preparedness: ICCs remain unevenly trained and often risk-averse, unintentionally reinforcing protection for powerful perpetrators over vulnerable complainants. Silent Serial Offenders: Absence of information-sharing or cross-institution coordination enables repeat offenders to continue exploiting multiple academic environments.   Way Forward Expand Definitions: Incorporate informed consent, emotional coercion, and digital harassment into statutory definitions to reflect contemporary realities. Extend Timelines: Increase or remove the three-month limitation period to ensure survivors are not denied justice due to delayed recognition or fear. Improve Evidence Protocols: Develop clear guidelines for handling digital evidence and expand the use of corroborative or behavioural indicators in ICC assessments. Build ICC Capacity: Mandate periodic legal, psychological, and technological training for ICC members to improve sensitivity and evidence evaluation. Inter-Institutional Mechanisms: Create a confidential national or sectoral registry enabling institutions to share information on proven offenders to prevent serial misconduct.   Conclusion The POSH Act was transformative in 2013, but evolving power structures, digital interactions, and emotional manipulation demand a stronger, clearer, survivor-centric law in 2025. Justice must be embedded in the system, not dependent on a victim’s endurance or institutional goodwill.   Mains Question  Despite being a landmark legislation, the POSH Act, 2013 faces gaps that dilute its effectiveness. Critically evaluate these challenges and suggest reforms to strengthen workplace justice for women.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu Row over DGP Appointment in Tamil Nadu: Federal Tensions in Police Reforms (UPSC GS Paper II – “Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary; Issues and Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure; Role of UPSC”)   Context (Introduction) Tamil Nadu’s inability to appoint a regular Director-General of Police before the incumbent’s retirement, rejection of the UPSC panel, and allegations of contempt of Supreme Court guidelines have reignited debates on State autonomy, police reforms, and Centre–State coordination.   Main Arguments: Why the Issue Matters Prakash Singh Mandate: The 2006 judgment mandates that States select the DGP only from a UPSC-approved panel of the three seniormost eligible IPS officers based on service length, record, and experience. Tenure Protection: The Court’s requirement of a minimum two-year fixed tenure for DGPs seeks to depoliticise police leadership and promote administrative continuity. Procedural Timeline: States must send proposals to the UPSC three months before the anticipated vacancy, a rule Tamil Nadu violated by submitting its list only a day before retirement. Autonomy vs Oversight: The State’s rejection of the UPSC panel as “unacceptable” highlights ongoing tensions between State preference and UPSC-mandated merit-based selection. Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s request for immediate appointment after UPSC recommendations underscores the judiciary’s role in enforcing police reform compliance.   Challenges / Criticisms  Delayed Compliance: Tamil Nadu’s failure to meet the three-month proposal deadline disrupted the selection process and invited judicial scrutiny. CAT Proceedings: Pending litigation before the Central Administrative Tribunal delayed the State’s actions, yet the Court held that this cannot justify procedural non-compliance. Withheld Integrity Certificate: The State withdrew integrity clearance for one officer and expressed reluctance to consider three others without transparent explanations. Panel Rejection: Tamil Nadu’s objection to the UPSC panel and request for another meeting contradicted the structured process laid down in Prakash Singh. Contempt Allegations: Appointment of an “in-charge” DGP instead of a regular one has triggered contempt petitions alleging wilful violation of Supreme Court guidelines.   Way Forward Strict Adherence: States must comply with the Prakash Singh framework to ensure transparency, stability, and depoliticisation of police leadership. Timeline Discipline: Institutionalising internal reminders and administrative protocols can prevent last-minute submissions that derail the selection process. Integrity Transparency: Clear, recorded reasons for withholding integrity certificates must be shared with the UPSC to prevent arbitrariness. Cooperative Federalism: Structured consultation between State governments and the UPSC can reduce conflict while respecting the merit-based selection process. Monitoring Mechanism: A periodic compliance audit by the Supreme Court or an independent oversight body could strengthen police reform implementation nationwide.   Conclusion The DGP appointment controversy in Tamil Nadu highlights the unresolved tension between political discretion and judicially mandated police reforms. Ensuring merit-based selection, transparent procedures, and timely coordination is essential to build a professional, independent police leadership.   Mains Question  The Prakash Singh reforms sought to depoliticise police leadership through transparent and merit-based appointments. Discuss (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Hindu Indian Constitution Beyond Western Liberalism: A Transformative Rights Vision (UPSC GS Paper II – “Indian Constitution—Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions; Comparison with Other Constitutions”)   Context (Introduction) As India marks 76 years of the Constitution’s adoption, renewed analysis highlights how its framers deliberately moved beyond Western constitutional models, designing a transformative charter that addressed social hierarchies, group rights, and structural inequalities embedded in India’s social fabric.   Why India’s Constitutional Vision Was Ahead of Its Time Transformative Equality: The Constitution expanded equality beyond Western notions by recognising caste-driven discrimination from both the state and private actors through Articles 14, 15(2), 17, and 23. Social Power Recognition: By acknowledging that power in India is wielded not only by the state but also by entrenched social groups, the Constitution mandated state action to dismantle societal hierarchies. Affirmative Action Leadership: India introduced constitutionally sanctioned reservations in 1950, a decade before U.S. civil rights reforms, making it a global pioneer in group-differentiated rights. Secular Pluralism: The Constitution adopted a nuanced secular framework—eschewing state religion, prohibiting compulsory religious taxes (Art. 27), and safeguarding individual (Art. 25) and group religious freedoms (Art. 26). Minority Cultural Rights: Through Articles 29 and 30, the Constitution empowered linguistic and religious minorities to preserve their culture and manage educational institutions, ensuring pluralist nation-building.   Challenges / Criticisms  Partial Rights Protection: Certain freedoms remained circumscribed due to colonial-era emergency provisions, allowing governments to suspend rights in broad circumstances. Executive Dominance: The Constitution created a powerful executive with sweeping discretionary powers, raising concerns about civil liberty safeguards. Uneven Pluralism: While minority and cultural protections exist, their scope has sometimes been reduced or inconsistently implemented. Debates on Group Rights: Intense Constituent Assembly debates reflected tensions between equality and differentiated protections, leaving some ambiguities unresolved. Limitations of Remedies: Judicial review exists, but access to remedies can be limited when rights are suspended under exceptional circumstances.   Deepening the Constitution’s Transformative Promise Strengthen Social Equality: Reinforce constitutional mandates against societal discrimination through stronger implementation of Articles 15(2) and 17. Balance Executive Power: Revisit emergency provisions and enhance institutional checks to prevent misuse of executive authority. Promote Pluralist Governance: Uphold minority cultural and educational rights consistently to preserve India’s pluralism in practice. Expand Rights Awareness: Enhance civic education and public literacy on constitutional rights to democratise access to justice. Safeguard Transformative Vision: Protect affirmative action and group-differentiated rights as foundational tools against structural inequality.   Conclusion India’s Constitution is not merely a legal document but a transformative project that acknowledges deep social inequalities and plural identities. Its endurance reflects a commitment to equality that respects diversity, showing that national unity and constitutional longevity emerge not from uniformity, but from inclusive recognition of difference.   Mains Question The Indian Constitution deliberately moved beyond Western liberal constitutionalism. Critically examine how this transformative vision has shaped India’s constitutional experience. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 26th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) HAMMER Weapon System Category: Defence and Security Context: Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) signed an agreement for the production of HAMMER weapon system in India. About HAMMER Weapon System: Nomenclature: HAMMER stands for Highly Agile and Manoeuvrable Munition Extended Range. It is also known as a glide bomb. Nature: It is an air-to-ground precision-guided weapon system and can be fitted to standard bombs of 250kg, 500kg, and 1,000kg weights. Development: Originally developed by Safran Electronics and Defence (SED), France, it is now set for joint manufacturing with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) in India. Range: HAMMER precision-guided munitions have a range of up to 70 km. It  Difficult to intercept: It is resistant to jamming, and capable of being launched from low altitudes over rough terrain. It is difficult to intercept and can penetrate fortified structures. Manoeuvrability: It is optimised for mountain warfare (e.g., Ladakh), allowing precision strikes even in complex topography and high-altitude environments. Uniqueness: It is a precision-guided weapon system known for its high accuracy and modular design, making it adaptable for multiple platforms, including the Rafale and Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. Significance of agreement: The development is crucial because India previously ordered this weapon system, along with other armaments, from France to equip its Rafale fighter jets in 2020 during standoff with China in eastern Ladakh. Source: The Indian Express APDIM Category: International Institutions Context: Recently, the 10th Session of the Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) took place at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi.               About APDIM: Nomenclature: APDIM stands for Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management. Nature: It is a regional institution of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  Vision: Its vision is to ensure effective disaster risk information is produced and used for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific.  Mandate: It aims to reduce human and material losses due to natural hazards and contribute to the effective design, investment and implementation of disaster risk reduction and resilience policies. Administration: It is governed by a Governing Council consisting of eight ESCAP member countries elected for a period of three years (India is one of the members for a period from 2022 to 2025). Headquarter: Its headquarters is located in Tehran, Iran. Functions: It functions as a regional facility to strengthen the science-policy interface. It also promotes effective regional cooperation, facilitates dialogue. Facilitates disaster management between countries: It facilitates the exchange of expertise, experiences, and knowledge in disaster information management between and within the countries of the region. Acts as a knowledge hub: It acts as a regional knowledge hub, consolidating and sharing disaster-related data, strengthening information systems, and supporting cooperation on transboundary hazards. Source: PIB Hayli Gubbi Volcano Category: Geography Context: The Hayli Gubbi volcano, located in Ethiopia’s Afar region for several hours after 12,000-year dormancy. About Hayli Gubbi Volcano: Location: Hayli Gubbi volcano is located in Afar, northeastern Ethiopia, within the Danakil Depression – one of the hottest and lowest places on Earth. Hotspot for seismic activity: The Afar Triple Junction, where the Red Sea Rift, Gulf of Aden Rift, and East African Rift meet, makes this region a hotspot for volcanic and seismic activity. Uniqueness: The current eruption is unique because the volcano is believed to have erupted after nearly 12,000 years, based on geological evidence from the Afar Rift. Composition of volcanic plume: The ash cloud contained a mix of volcanic ash, sulphur dioxide, glass shards, and rock fragments, transported at high altitudes between 15,000-45,000 ft. These aerosols can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks depending on wind patterns and atmospheric stability. Significance: The Hayli Gubbi eruption highlights the geological volatility of the East African Rift System (EARS) where active volcanism, fissure eruptions, and spreading ridges are common. At the junction of diverging plates: It is one of the world’s most tectonically active rift systems where the Arabian, Nubian, and Somali plates are diverging. Characterised by basaltic lava: The region is characterised by basaltic lava, fissure systems, and frequent seismic activity linked to the continental rifting process. Source: The Hindu Special Leave Petition (SLP) Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Jammu & Kashmir HC has observed that dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), does not lead to merger of the impugned order with the Supreme Court’s order. About Special Leave Petition (SLP): Definition: A SLP is a request made to the Supreme Court seeking special permission to appeal against any judgment, order, or decree from any court or tribunal (except military tribunals), even when the law does not provide a statutory right of appeal. Not a right: Special Leave Petition (SLP) is not a right—it’s a privilege granted by the Supreme Court at its discretion. It is a discretionary/optional power of the SC, and the court can refuse to grant the appeal at its discretion. Constitutional provision: Article 136 states that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, or order from any court or tribunal in India. Conditions for using SLP: It can only be exercised when a substantial question of law or gross injustice has been committed. A judgement, decree, or order need not be final for an SLP. An interim or interlocutory order or decree can also be challenged. Filed by: SLP can be filed by any aggrieved party (individual or business). government bodies, public sector undertakings or NGOs or associations (in relevant cases). Filed against: SLP can be filed against judgments from High Courts, Tribunals (except those under armed forces) or Quasi-judicial bodies. Time limit to file SLP: It can be filed against any judgment of the High Court within 90 days from the date of judgment or it can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to SC. Procedure for a SLP: A SLP must contain all the facts upon which the SC is to decide, which revolve around the grounds on which an SLP can be filed. The said petition needs to be duly signed by an Advocate-on-Record. The petitioner must include a statement within the SLP stating that no other petition has been filed in a High Court. Acceptance or rejection by SC: Once the petition is filed, the SC will hear the aggrieved party and depending upon the merits of the case, will allow the opposite party to state their part in a counter affidavit. After the hearing, if the court deems the case fit for further hearing, it will allow the same; otherwise, it will reject the appeal. Source: Live Law Bharat NCAP 2.0 Category: Government Schemes Context: India’s vehicle safety roadmap is set for a major upgrade as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has released a draft for Bharat NCAP 2.0. About Bharat NCAP: Nature: The Bharat New Car Assessment Programme (Bharat NCAP) is an indigenous star-rating system for crash testing cars, under which vehicles will be assigned between one to five stars, indicating their safety in a collision.  Partnership: It is an ambitious joint project between the Government of India (GoI) and Global NCAP, the regulatory body behind the safety crash test ratings. Launch: It was launched on 22 August 2023 and commenced on 1 October 2023. Objective: It aims to help consumers make an informed decision before purchasing a car, thereby spurring demand for safer cars. Nodal ministry: Bharat NCAP is overseen by the Ministry of Road Transport, but is an independent body. Testing protocol: Under the Bharat NCAP, cars voluntarily nominated by automobile manufacturers will be crash tested as per protocols laid down in the Automotive Industry Standard (AIS) 197. 3 safety domains: Vehicles tested under the Bharat NCAP are evaluated across three critical safety domains- adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and safety assist technologies. Applicability: Only right-hand drive passenger vehicles on sale in India and weighing less than 3,500 kg are eligible for consideration. Base variants of cars are to be tested, and ratings will be applicable for four years. Eligible vehicles: Besides internal combustion engine (ICE) models, CNG cars as well as battery-powered electric vehicles are eligible to undergo the safety test. Voluntary in nature: It is a voluntary programme under which the cost of the car for assessment for star rating and the cost of such assessment are borne by the respective vehicle manufacturer or importer. Validity: The current Bharat NCAP regulations remain valid until September 30, 2027, after which Bharat NCAP 2.0 is expected to be implemented by October 2027. About Bharat NCAP 2.0 Draft Guidelines: Based on 5 pillars: The Bharat NCAP 2.0 proposal introduces a 100-point rating system across five pillars- Crash Protection, Vulnerable Road-User Protection, Safe Driving, Accident Avoidance, and Post-Crash Safety. Use of minimum score in a rating system: From 2027-29, a 5-star rating will require 70 points, and this would rise to 80 points from 2029-31. Minimum scores will also apply across each pillar. Updated norms: It brings in fresh mandatory tests, revised scoring methods, and updated safety verticals. Uniqueness: Notably, for the first time, vehicles will be assessed on vulnerable road user protection. Expansion of crash test: The crash test will be expanded from two to five and will now have Male, female, and child dummies for testing. The cars will go through offset frontal impact, full-width frontal impact, side impact, and rear impact. Curtain airbags compulsory: Electronic stability control (ESC) and curtain airbags will be compulsory for any model seeking a star rating. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) remains optional. Source: India Today (MAINS Focus) Strengthening the POSH Act: Closing Gaps in Workplace Justice (UPSC GS Paper II – “Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions for Vulnerable Sections; Issues Relating to Women”)   Context (Introduction) A recent Chandigarh case where a college professor was dismissed following an ICC probe under the POSH Act has revived debate on low conviction rates, procedural gaps, digital-era challenges, and the Act’s inability to address informed consent and power asymmetry in academic institutions.   Main Arguments Conceptual Clarity: The Act’s focus on consent without recognising informed consent overlooks manipulation, emotional coercion, and power asymmetry in workplaces and universities. Emotional Exploitation: Emotional or psychological harassment arising from deceitful relationships remains outside the Act’s scope despite being a prominent form of abuse in hierarchical settings. Time-Barred Justice: The three-month limitation period discourages survivors who often need longer to recognise manipulation, gather evidence, and overcome fear of institutional backlash. Diluted Terminology: Referring to the accused as a “respondent” rather than “accused” symbolically downplays the gravity of sexual harassment compared to similar acts outside workplaces. Behavioural Evidence: Ambiguous definitions make ICCs rely heavily on direct evidence, ignoring circumstantial indicators or behavioural patterns that commonly characterise harassment cases.   Challenges / Criticisms  Inter-Institutional Blind Spot: The Act lacks mechanisms to address misconduct spanning multiple campuses despite frequent cross-institutional interactions in academia. Procedural Trauma: Complainants often face delays, institutional hesitation, emotional fatigue, and fear of counter-action under the “malicious complaint” clause. Digital Evidence Gaps: ICCs struggle to interpret modern digital evidence—disappearing messages, encrypted chats, single-view photos—due to lack of legal and technical training. Institutional Under preparedness: ICCs remain unevenly trained and often risk-averse, unintentionally reinforcing protection for powerful perpetrators over vulnerable complainants. Silent Serial Offenders: Absence of information-sharing or cross-institution coordination enables repeat offenders to continue exploiting multiple academic environments.   Way Forward Expand Definitions: Incorporate informed consent, emotional coercion, and digital harassment into statutory definitions to reflect contemporary realities. Extend Timelines: Increase or remove the three-month limitation period to ensure survivors are not denied justice due to delayed recognition or fear. Improve Evidence Protocols: Develop clear guidelines for handling digital evidence and expand the use of corroborative or behavioural indicators in ICC assessments. Build ICC Capacity: Mandate periodic legal, psychological, and technological training for ICC members to improve sensitivity and evidence evaluation. Inter-Institutional Mechanisms: Create a confidential national or sectoral registry enabling institutions to share information on proven offenders to prevent serial misconduct.   Conclusion The POSH Act was transformative in 2013, but evolving power structures, digital interactions, and emotional manipulation demand a stronger, clearer, survivor-centric law in 2025. Justice must be embedded in the system, not dependent on a victim’s endurance or institutional goodwill.   Mains Question  Despite being a landmark legislation, the POSH Act, 2013 faces gaps that dilute its effectiveness. Critically evaluate these challenges and suggest reforms to strengthen workplace justice for women.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu Row over DGP Appointment in Tamil Nadu: Federal Tensions in Police Reforms (UPSC GS Paper II – “Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary; Issues and Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure; Role of UPSC”)   Context (Introduction) Tamil Nadu’s inability to appoint a regular Director-General of Police before the incumbent’s retirement, rejection of the UPSC panel, and allegations of contempt of Supreme Court guidelines have reignited debates on State autonomy, police reforms, and Centre–State coordination.   Main Arguments: Why the Issue Matters Prakash Singh Mandate: The 2006 judgment mandates that States select the DGP only from a UPSC-approved panel of the three seniormost eligible IPS officers based on service length, record, and experience. Tenure Protection: The Court’s requirement of a minimum two-year fixed tenure for DGPs seeks to depoliticise police leadership and promote administrative continuity. Procedural Timeline: States must send proposals to the UPSC three months before the anticipated vacancy, a rule Tamil Nadu violated by submitting its list only a day before retirement. Autonomy vs Oversight: The State’s rejection of the UPSC panel as “unacceptable” highlights ongoing tensions between State preference and UPSC-mandated merit-based selection. Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s request for immediate appointment after UPSC recommendations underscores the judiciary’s role in enforcing police reform compliance.   Challenges / Criticisms  Delayed Compliance: Tamil Nadu’s failure to meet the three-month proposal deadline disrupted the selection process and invited judicial scrutiny. CAT Proceedings: Pending litigation before the Central Administrative Tribunal delayed the State’s actions, yet the Court held that this cannot justify procedural non-compliance. Withheld Integrity Certificate: The State withdrew integrity clearance for one officer and expressed reluctance to consider three others without transparent explanations. Panel Rejection: Tamil Nadu’s objection to the UPSC panel and request for another meeting contradicted the structured process laid down in Prakash Singh. Contempt Allegations: Appointment of an “in-charge” DGP instead of a regular one has triggered contempt petitions alleging wilful violation of Supreme Court guidelines.   Way Forward Strict Adherence: States must comply with the Prakash Singh framework to ensure transparency, stability, and depoliticisation of police leadership. Timeline Discipline: Institutionalising internal reminders and administrative protocols can prevent last-minute submissions that derail the selection process. Integrity Transparency: Clear, recorded reasons for withholding integrity certificates must be shared with the UPSC to prevent arbitrariness. Cooperative Federalism: Structured consultation between State governments and the UPSC can reduce conflict while respecting the merit-based selection process. Monitoring Mechanism: A periodic compliance audit by the Supreme Court or an independent oversight body could strengthen police reform implementation nationwide.   Conclusion The DGP appointment controversy in Tamil Nadu highlights the unresolved tension between political discretion and judicially mandated police reforms. Ensuring merit-based selection, transparent procedures, and timely coordination is essential to build a professional, independent police leadership.   Mains Question  The Prakash Singh reforms sought to depoliticise police leadership through transparent and merit-based appointments. Discuss (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Hindu Indian Constitution Beyond Western Liberalism: A Transformative Rights Vision (UPSC GS Paper II – “Indian Constitution—Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions; Comparison with Other Constitutions”)   Context (Introduction) As India marks 76 years of the Constitution’s adoption, renewed analysis highlights how its framers deliberately moved beyond Western constitutional models, designing a transformative charter that addressed social hierarchies, group rights, and structural inequalities embedded in India’s social fabric.   Why India’s Constitutional Vision Was Ahead of Its Time Transformative Equality: The Constitution expanded equality beyond Western notions by recognising caste-driven discrimination from both the state and private actors through Articles 14, 15(2), 17, and 23. Social Power Recognition: By acknowledging that power in India is wielded not only by the state but also by entrenched social groups, the Constitution mandated state action to dismantle societal hierarchies. Affirmative Action Leadership: India introduced constitutionally sanctioned reservations in 1950, a decade before U.S. civil rights reforms, making it a global pioneer in group-differentiated rights. Secular Pluralism: The Constitution adopted a nuanced secular framework—eschewing state religion, prohibiting compulsory religious taxes (Art. 27), and safeguarding individual (Art. 25) and group religious freedoms (Art. 26). Minority Cultural Rights: Through Articles 29 and 30, the Constitution empowered linguistic and religious minorities to preserve their culture and manage educational institutions, ensuring pluralist nation-building.   Challenges / Criticisms  Partial Rights Protection: Certain freedoms remained circumscribed due to colonial-era emergency provisions, allowing governments to suspend rights in broad circumstances. Executive Dominance: The Constitution created a powerful executive with sweeping discretionary powers, raising concerns about civil liberty safeguards. Uneven Pluralism: While minority and cultural protections exist, their scope has sometimes been reduced or inconsistently implemented. Debates on Group Rights: Intense Constituent Assembly debates reflected tensions between equality and differentiated protections, leaving some ambiguities unresolved. Limitations of Remedies: Judicial review exists, but access to remedies can be limited when rights are suspended under exceptional circumstances.   Deepening the Constitution’s Transformative Promise Strengthen Social Equality: Reinforce constitutional mandates against societal discrimination through stronger implementation of Articles 15(2) and 17. Balance Executive Power: Revisit emergency provisions and enhance institutional checks to prevent misuse of executive authority. Promote Pluralist Governance: Uphold minority cultural and educational rights consistently to preserve India’s pluralism in practice. Expand Rights Awareness: Enhance civic education and public literacy on constitutional rights to democratise access to justice. Safeguard Transformative Vision: Protect affirmative action and group-differentiated rights as foundational tools against structural inequality.   Conclusion India’s Constitution is not merely a legal document but a transformative project that acknowledges deep social inequalities and plural identities. Its endurance reflects a commitment to equality that respects diversity, showing that national unity and constitutional longevity emerge not from uniformity, but from inclusive recognition of difference.   Mains Question The Indian Constitution deliberately moved beyond Western liberal constitutionalism. Critically examine how this transformative vision has shaped India’s constitutional experience. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 26th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) HAMMER Weapon System Category: Defence and Security Context: Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) signed an agreement for the production of HAMMER weapon system in India. About HAMMER Weapon System: Nomenclature: HAMMER stands for Highly Agile and Manoeuvrable Munition Extended Range. It is also known as a glide bomb. Nature: It is an air-to-ground precision-guided weapon system and can be fitted to standard bombs of 250kg, 500kg, and 1,000kg weights. Development: Originally developed by Safran Electronics and Defence (SED), France, it is now set for joint manufacturing with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) in India. Range: HAMMER precision-guided munitions have a range of up to 70 km. It  Difficult to intercept: It is resistant to jamming, and capable of being launched from low altitudes over rough terrain. It is difficult to intercept and can penetrate fortified structures. Manoeuvrability: It is optimised for mountain warfare (e.g., Ladakh), allowing precision strikes even in complex topography and high-altitude environments. Uniqueness: It is a precision-guided weapon system known for its high accuracy and modular design, making it adaptable for multiple platforms, including the Rafale and Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. Significance of agreement: The development is crucial because India previously ordered this weapon system, along with other armaments, from France to equip its Rafale fighter jets in 2020 during standoff with China in eastern Ladakh. Source: The Indian Express APDIM Category: International Institutions Context: Recently, the 10th Session of the Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) took place at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi.               About APDIM: Nomenclature: APDIM stands for Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management. Nature: It is a regional institution of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  Vision: Its vision is to ensure effective disaster risk information is produced and used for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific.  Mandate: It aims to reduce human and material losses due to natural hazards and contribute to the effective design, investment and implementation of disaster risk reduction and resilience policies. Administration: It is governed by a Governing Council consisting of eight ESCAP member countries elected for a period of three years (India is one of the members for a period from 2022 to 2025). Headquarter: Its headquarters is located in Tehran, Iran. Functions: It functions as a regional facility to strengthen the science-policy interface. It also promotes effective regional cooperation, facilitates dialogue. Facilitates disaster management between countries: It facilitates the exchange of expertise, experiences, and knowledge in disaster information management between and within the countries of the region. Acts as a knowledge hub: It acts as a regional knowledge hub, consolidating and sharing disaster-related data, strengthening information systems, and supporting cooperation on transboundary hazards. Source: PIB Hayli Gubbi Volcano Category: Geography Context: The Hayli Gubbi volcano, located in Ethiopia’s Afar region for several hours after 12,000-year dormancy. About Hayli Gubbi Volcano: Location: Hayli Gubbi volcano is located in Afar, northeastern Ethiopia, within the Danakil Depression – one of the hottest and lowest places on Earth. Hotspot for seismic activity: The Afar Triple Junction, where the Red Sea Rift, Gulf of Aden Rift, and East African Rift meet, makes this region a hotspot for volcanic and seismic activity. Uniqueness: The current eruption is unique because the volcano is believed to have erupted after nearly 12,000 years, based on geological evidence from the Afar Rift. Composition of volcanic plume: The ash cloud contained a mix of volcanic ash, sulphur dioxide, glass shards, and rock fragments, transported at high altitudes between 15,000-45,000 ft. These aerosols can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks depending on wind patterns and atmospheric stability. Significance: The Hayli Gubbi eruption highlights the geological volatility of the East African Rift System (EARS) where active volcanism, fissure eruptions, and spreading ridges are common. At the junction of diverging plates: It is one of the world’s most tectonically active rift systems where the Arabian, Nubian, and Somali plates are diverging. Characterised by basaltic lava: The region is characterised by basaltic lava, fissure systems, and frequent seismic activity linked to the continental rifting process. Source: The Hindu Special Leave Petition (SLP) Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Jammu & Kashmir HC has observed that dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), does not lead to merger of the impugned order with the Supreme Court’s order. About Special Leave Petition (SLP): Definition: A SLP is a request made to the Supreme Court seeking special permission to appeal against any judgment, order, or decree from any court or tribunal (except military tribunals), even when the law does not provide a statutory right of appeal. Not a right: Special Leave Petition (SLP) is not a right—it’s a privilege granted by the Supreme Court at its discretion. It is a discretionary/optional power of the SC, and the court can refuse to grant the appeal at its discretion. Constitutional provision: Article 136 states that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, or order from any court or tribunal in India. Conditions for using SLP: It can only be exercised when a substantial question of law or gross injustice has been committed. A judgement, decree, or order need not be final for an SLP. An interim or interlocutory order or decree can also be challenged. Filed by: SLP can be filed by any aggrieved party (individual or business). government bodies, public sector undertakings or NGOs or associations (in relevant cases). Filed against: SLP can be filed against judgments from High Courts, Tribunals (except those under armed forces) or Quasi-judicial bodies. Time limit to file SLP: It can be filed against any judgment of the High Court within 90 days from the date of judgment or it can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to SC. Procedure for a SLP: A SLP must contain all the facts upon which the SC is to decide, which revolve around the grounds on which an SLP can be filed. The said petition needs to be duly signed by an Advocate-on-Record. The petitioner must include a statement within the SLP stating that no other petition has been filed in a High Court. Acceptance or rejection by SC: Once the petition is filed, the SC will hear the aggrieved party and depending upon the merits of the case, will allow the opposite party to state their part in a counter affidavit. After the hearing, if the court deems the case fit for further hearing, it will allow the same; otherwise, it will reject the appeal. Source: Live Law Bharat NCAP 2.0 Category: Government Schemes Context: India’s vehicle safety roadmap is set for a major upgrade as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has released a draft for Bharat NCAP 2.0. About Bharat NCAP: Nature: The Bharat New Car Assessment Programme (Bharat NCAP) is an indigenous star-rating system for crash testing cars, under which vehicles will be assigned between one to five stars, indicating their safety in a collision.  Partnership: It is an ambitious joint project between the Government of India (GoI) and Global NCAP, the regulatory body behind the safety crash test ratings. Launch: It was launched on 22 August 2023 and commenced on 1 October 2023. Objective: It aims to help consumers make an informed decision before purchasing a car, thereby spurring demand for safer cars. Nodal ministry: Bharat NCAP is overseen by the Ministry of Road Transport, but is an independent body. Testing protocol: Under the Bharat NCAP, cars voluntarily nominated by automobile manufacturers will be crash tested as per protocols laid down in the Automotive Industry Standard (AIS) 197. 3 safety domains: Vehicles tested under the Bharat NCAP are evaluated across three critical safety domains- adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and safety assist technologies. Applicability: Only right-hand drive passenger vehicles on sale in India and weighing less than 3,500 kg are eligible for consideration. Base variants of cars are to be tested, and ratings will be applicable for four years. Eligible vehicles: Besides internal combustion engine (ICE) models, CNG cars as well as battery-powered electric vehicles are eligible to undergo the safety test. Voluntary in nature: It is a voluntary programme under which the cost of the car for assessment for star rating and the cost of such assessment are borne by the respective vehicle manufacturer or importer. Validity: The current Bharat NCAP regulations remain valid until September 30, 2027, after which Bharat NCAP 2.0 is expected to be implemented by October 2027. About Bharat NCAP 2.0 Draft Guidelines: Based on 5 pillars: The Bharat NCAP 2.0 proposal introduces a 100-point rating system across five pillars- Crash Protection, Vulnerable Road-User Protection, Safe Driving, Accident Avoidance, and Post-Crash Safety. Use of minimum score in a rating system: From 2027-29, a 5-star rating will require 70 points, and this would rise to 80 points from 2029-31. Minimum scores will also apply across each pillar. Updated norms: It brings in fresh mandatory tests, revised scoring methods, and updated safety verticals. Uniqueness: Notably, for the first time, vehicles will be assessed on vulnerable road user protection. Expansion of crash test: The crash test will be expanded from two to five and will now have Male, female, and child dummies for testing. The cars will go through offset frontal impact, full-width frontal impact, side impact, and rear impact. Curtain airbags compulsory: Electronic stability control (ESC) and curtain airbags will be compulsory for any model seeking a star rating. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) remains optional. Source: India Today (MAINS Focus) Strengthening the POSH Act: Closing Gaps in Workplace Justice (UPSC GS Paper II – “Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions for Vulnerable Sections; Issues Relating to Women”)   Context (Introduction) A recent Chandigarh case where a college professor was dismissed following an ICC probe under the POSH Act has revived debate on low conviction rates, procedural gaps, digital-era challenges, and the Act’s inability to address informed consent and power asymmetry in academic institutions.   Main Arguments Conceptual Clarity: The Act’s focus on consent without recognising informed consent overlooks manipulation, emotional coercion, and power asymmetry in workplaces and universities. Emotional Exploitation: Emotional or psychological harassment arising from deceitful relationships remains outside the Act’s scope despite being a prominent form of abuse in hierarchical settings. Time-Barred Justice: The three-month limitation period discourages survivors who often need longer to recognise manipulation, gather evidence, and overcome fear of institutional backlash. Diluted Terminology: Referring to the accused as a “respondent” rather than “accused” symbolically downplays the gravity of sexual harassment compared to similar acts outside workplaces. Behavioural Evidence: Ambiguous definitions make ICCs rely heavily on direct evidence, ignoring circumstantial indicators or behavioural patterns that commonly characterise harassment cases.   Challenges / Criticisms  Inter-Institutional Blind Spot: The Act lacks mechanisms to address misconduct spanning multiple campuses despite frequent cross-institutional interactions in academia. Procedural Trauma: Complainants often face delays, institutional hesitation, emotional fatigue, and fear of counter-action under the “malicious complaint” clause. Digital Evidence Gaps: ICCs struggle to interpret modern digital evidence—disappearing messages, encrypted chats, single-view photos—due to lack of legal and technical training. Institutional Under preparedness: ICCs remain unevenly trained and often risk-averse, unintentionally reinforcing protection for powerful perpetrators over vulnerable complainants. Silent Serial Offenders: Absence of information-sharing or cross-institution coordination enables repeat offenders to continue exploiting multiple academic environments.   Way Forward Expand Definitions: Incorporate informed consent, emotional coercion, and digital harassment into statutory definitions to reflect contemporary realities. Extend Timelines: Increase or remove the three-month limitation period to ensure survivors are not denied justice due to delayed recognition or fear. Improve Evidence Protocols: Develop clear guidelines for handling digital evidence and expand the use of corroborative or behavioural indicators in ICC assessments. Build ICC Capacity: Mandate periodic legal, psychological, and technological training for ICC members to improve sensitivity and evidence evaluation. Inter-Institutional Mechanisms: Create a confidential national or sectoral registry enabling institutions to share information on proven offenders to prevent serial misconduct.   Conclusion The POSH Act was transformative in 2013, but evolving power structures, digital interactions, and emotional manipulation demand a stronger, clearer, survivor-centric law in 2025. Justice must be embedded in the system, not dependent on a victim’s endurance or institutional goodwill.   Mains Question  Despite being a landmark legislation, the POSH Act, 2013 faces gaps that dilute its effectiveness. Critically evaluate these challenges and suggest reforms to strengthen workplace justice for women.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu Row over DGP Appointment in Tamil Nadu: Federal Tensions in Police Reforms (UPSC GS Paper II – “Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary; Issues and Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure; Role of UPSC”)   Context (Introduction) Tamil Nadu’s inability to appoint a regular Director-General of Police before the incumbent’s retirement, rejection of the UPSC panel, and allegations of contempt of Supreme Court guidelines have reignited debates on State autonomy, police reforms, and Centre–State coordination.   Main Arguments: Why the Issue Matters Prakash Singh Mandate: The 2006 judgment mandates that States select the DGP only from a UPSC-approved panel of the three seniormost eligible IPS officers based on service length, record, and experience. Tenure Protection: The Court’s requirement of a minimum two-year fixed tenure for DGPs seeks to depoliticise police leadership and promote administrative continuity. Procedural Timeline: States must send proposals to the UPSC three months before the anticipated vacancy, a rule Tamil Nadu violated by submitting its list only a day before retirement. Autonomy vs Oversight: The State’s rejection of the UPSC panel as “unacceptable” highlights ongoing tensions between State preference and UPSC-mandated merit-based selection. Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s request for immediate appointment after UPSC recommendations underscores the judiciary’s role in enforcing police reform compliance.   Challenges / Criticisms  Delayed Compliance: Tamil Nadu’s failure to meet the three-month proposal deadline disrupted the selection process and invited judicial scrutiny. CAT Proceedings: Pending litigation before the Central Administrative Tribunal delayed the State’s actions, yet the Court held that this cannot justify procedural non-compliance. Withheld Integrity Certificate: The State withdrew integrity clearance for one officer and expressed reluctance to consider three others without transparent explanations. Panel Rejection: Tamil Nadu’s objection to the UPSC panel and request for another meeting contradicted the structured process laid down in Prakash Singh. Contempt Allegations: Appointment of an “in-charge” DGP instead of a regular one has triggered contempt petitions alleging wilful violation of Supreme Court guidelines.   Way Forward Strict Adherence: States must comply with the Prakash Singh framework to ensure transparency, stability, and depoliticisation of police leadership. Timeline Discipline: Institutionalising internal reminders and administrative protocols can prevent last-minute submissions that derail the selection process. Integrity Transparency: Clear, recorded reasons for withholding integrity certificates must be shared with the UPSC to prevent arbitrariness. Cooperative Federalism: Structured consultation between State governments and the UPSC can reduce conflict while respecting the merit-based selection process. Monitoring Mechanism: A periodic compliance audit by the Supreme Court or an independent oversight body could strengthen police reform implementation nationwide.   Conclusion The DGP appointment controversy in Tamil Nadu highlights the unresolved tension between political discretion and judicially mandated police reforms. Ensuring merit-based selection, transparent procedures, and timely coordination is essential to build a professional, independent police leadership.   Mains Question  The Prakash Singh reforms sought to depoliticise police leadership through transparent and merit-based appointments. Discuss (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Hindu Indian Constitution Beyond Western Liberalism: A Transformative Rights Vision (UPSC GS Paper II – “Indian Constitution—Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions; Comparison with Other Constitutions”)   Context (Introduction) As India marks 76 years of the Constitution’s adoption, renewed analysis highlights how its framers deliberately moved beyond Western constitutional models, designing a transformative charter that addressed social hierarchies, group rights, and structural inequalities embedded in India’s social fabric.   Why India’s Constitutional Vision Was Ahead of Its Time Transformative Equality: The Constitution expanded equality beyond Western notions by recognising caste-driven discrimination from both the state and private actors through Articles 14, 15(2), 17, and 23. Social Power Recognition: By acknowledging that power in India is wielded not only by the state but also by entrenched social groups, the Constitution mandated state action to dismantle societal hierarchies. Affirmative Action Leadership: India introduced constitutionally sanctioned reservations in 1950, a decade before U.S. civil rights reforms, making it a global pioneer in group-differentiated rights. Secular Pluralism: The Constitution adopted a nuanced secular framework—eschewing state religion, prohibiting compulsory religious taxes (Art. 27), and safeguarding individual (Art. 25) and group religious freedoms (Art. 26). Minority Cultural Rights: Through Articles 29 and 30, the Constitution empowered linguistic and religious minorities to preserve their culture and manage educational institutions, ensuring pluralist nation-building.   Challenges / Criticisms  Partial Rights Protection: Certain freedoms remained circumscribed due to colonial-era emergency provisions, allowing governments to suspend rights in broad circumstances. Executive Dominance: The Constitution created a powerful executive with sweeping discretionary powers, raising concerns about civil liberty safeguards. Uneven Pluralism: While minority and cultural protections exist, their scope has sometimes been reduced or inconsistently implemented. Debates on Group Rights: Intense Constituent Assembly debates reflected tensions between equality and differentiated protections, leaving some ambiguities unresolved. Limitations of Remedies: Judicial review exists, but access to remedies can be limited when rights are suspended under exceptional circumstances.   Deepening the Constitution’s Transformative Promise Strengthen Social Equality: Reinforce constitutional mandates against societal discrimination through stronger implementation of Articles 15(2) and 17. Balance Executive Power: Revisit emergency provisions and enhance institutional checks to prevent misuse of executive authority. Promote Pluralist Governance: Uphold minority cultural and educational rights consistently to preserve India’s pluralism in practice. Expand Rights Awareness: Enhance civic education and public literacy on constitutional rights to democratise access to justice. Safeguard Transformative Vision: Protect affirmative action and group-differentiated rights as foundational tools against structural inequality.   Conclusion India’s Constitution is not merely a legal document but a transformative project that acknowledges deep social inequalities and plural identities. Its endurance reflects a commitment to equality that respects diversity, showing that national unity and constitutional longevity emerge not from uniformity, but from inclusive recognition of difference.   Mains Question The Indian Constitution deliberately moved beyond Western liberal constitutionalism. Critically examine how this transformative vision has shaped India’s constitutional experience. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 26th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) HAMMER Weapon System Category: Defence and Security Context: Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) signed an agreement for the production of HAMMER weapon system in India. About HAMMER Weapon System: Nomenclature: HAMMER stands for Highly Agile and Manoeuvrable Munition Extended Range. It is also known as a glide bomb. Nature: It is an air-to-ground precision-guided weapon system and can be fitted to standard bombs of 250kg, 500kg, and 1,000kg weights. Development: Originally developed by Safran Electronics and Defence (SED), France, it is now set for joint manufacturing with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) in India. Range: HAMMER precision-guided munitions have a range of up to 70 km. It  Difficult to intercept: It is resistant to jamming, and capable of being launched from low altitudes over rough terrain. It is difficult to intercept and can penetrate fortified structures. Manoeuvrability: It is optimised for mountain warfare (e.g., Ladakh), allowing precision strikes even in complex topography and high-altitude environments. Uniqueness: It is a precision-guided weapon system known for its high accuracy and modular design, making it adaptable for multiple platforms, including the Rafale and Light Combat Aircraft Tejas. Significance of agreement: The development is crucial because India previously ordered this weapon system, along with other armaments, from France to equip its Rafale fighter jets in 2020 during standoff with China in eastern Ladakh. Source: The Indian Express APDIM Category: International Institutions Context: Recently, the 10th Session of the Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) took place at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi.               About APDIM: Nomenclature: APDIM stands for Asian and Pacific Centre for Development of Disaster Information Management. Nature: It is a regional institution of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  Vision: Its vision is to ensure effective disaster risk information is produced and used for sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific.  Mandate: It aims to reduce human and material losses due to natural hazards and contribute to the effective design, investment and implementation of disaster risk reduction and resilience policies. Administration: It is governed by a Governing Council consisting of eight ESCAP member countries elected for a period of three years (India is one of the members for a period from 2022 to 2025). Headquarter: Its headquarters is located in Tehran, Iran. Functions: It functions as a regional facility to strengthen the science-policy interface. It also promotes effective regional cooperation, facilitates dialogue. Facilitates disaster management between countries: It facilitates the exchange of expertise, experiences, and knowledge in disaster information management between and within the countries of the region. Acts as a knowledge hub: It acts as a regional knowledge hub, consolidating and sharing disaster-related data, strengthening information systems, and supporting cooperation on transboundary hazards. Source: PIB Hayli Gubbi Volcano Category: Geography Context: The Hayli Gubbi volcano, located in Ethiopia’s Afar region for several hours after 12,000-year dormancy. About Hayli Gubbi Volcano: Location: Hayli Gubbi volcano is located in Afar, northeastern Ethiopia, within the Danakil Depression – one of the hottest and lowest places on Earth. Hotspot for seismic activity: The Afar Triple Junction, where the Red Sea Rift, Gulf of Aden Rift, and East African Rift meet, makes this region a hotspot for volcanic and seismic activity. Uniqueness: The current eruption is unique because the volcano is believed to have erupted after nearly 12,000 years, based on geological evidence from the Afar Rift. Composition of volcanic plume: The ash cloud contained a mix of volcanic ash, sulphur dioxide, glass shards, and rock fragments, transported at high altitudes between 15,000-45,000 ft. These aerosols can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks depending on wind patterns and atmospheric stability. Significance: The Hayli Gubbi eruption highlights the geological volatility of the East African Rift System (EARS) where active volcanism, fissure eruptions, and spreading ridges are common. At the junction of diverging plates: It is one of the world’s most tectonically active rift systems where the Arabian, Nubian, and Somali plates are diverging. Characterised by basaltic lava: The region is characterised by basaltic lava, fissure systems, and frequent seismic activity linked to the continental rifting process. Source: The Hindu Special Leave Petition (SLP) Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Jammu & Kashmir HC has observed that dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), does not lead to merger of the impugned order with the Supreme Court’s order. About Special Leave Petition (SLP): Definition: A SLP is a request made to the Supreme Court seeking special permission to appeal against any judgment, order, or decree from any court or tribunal (except military tribunals), even when the law does not provide a statutory right of appeal. Not a right: Special Leave Petition (SLP) is not a right—it’s a privilege granted by the Supreme Court at its discretion. It is a discretionary/optional power of the SC, and the court can refuse to grant the appeal at its discretion. Constitutional provision: Article 136 states that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, or order from any court or tribunal in India. Conditions for using SLP: It can only be exercised when a substantial question of law or gross injustice has been committed. A judgement, decree, or order need not be final for an SLP. An interim or interlocutory order or decree can also be challenged. Filed by: SLP can be filed by any aggrieved party (individual or business). government bodies, public sector undertakings or NGOs or associations (in relevant cases). Filed against: SLP can be filed against judgments from High Courts, Tribunals (except those under armed forces) or Quasi-judicial bodies. Time limit to file SLP: It can be filed against any judgment of the High Court within 90 days from the date of judgment or it can be filed within 60 days against the order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate of fitness for appeal to SC. Procedure for a SLP: A SLP must contain all the facts upon which the SC is to decide, which revolve around the grounds on which an SLP can be filed. The said petition needs to be duly signed by an Advocate-on-Record. The petitioner must include a statement within the SLP stating that no other petition has been filed in a High Court. Acceptance or rejection by SC: Once the petition is filed, the SC will hear the aggrieved party and depending upon the merits of the case, will allow the opposite party to state their part in a counter affidavit. After the hearing, if the court deems the case fit for further hearing, it will allow the same; otherwise, it will reject the appeal. Source: Live Law Bharat NCAP 2.0 Category: Government Schemes Context: India’s vehicle safety roadmap is set for a major upgrade as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has released a draft for Bharat NCAP 2.0. About Bharat NCAP: Nature: The Bharat New Car Assessment Programme (Bharat NCAP) is an indigenous star-rating system for crash testing cars, under which vehicles will be assigned between one to five stars, indicating their safety in a collision.  Partnership: It is an ambitious joint project between the Government of India (GoI) and Global NCAP, the regulatory body behind the safety crash test ratings. Launch: It was launched on 22 August 2023 and commenced on 1 October 2023. Objective: It aims to help consumers make an informed decision before purchasing a car, thereby spurring demand for safer cars. Nodal ministry: Bharat NCAP is overseen by the Ministry of Road Transport, but is an independent body. Testing protocol: Under the Bharat NCAP, cars voluntarily nominated by automobile manufacturers will be crash tested as per protocols laid down in the Automotive Industry Standard (AIS) 197. 3 safety domains: Vehicles tested under the Bharat NCAP are evaluated across three critical safety domains- adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and safety assist technologies. Applicability: Only right-hand drive passenger vehicles on sale in India and weighing less than 3,500 kg are eligible for consideration. Base variants of cars are to be tested, and ratings will be applicable for four years. Eligible vehicles: Besides internal combustion engine (ICE) models, CNG cars as well as battery-powered electric vehicles are eligible to undergo the safety test. Voluntary in nature: It is a voluntary programme under which the cost of the car for assessment for star rating and the cost of such assessment are borne by the respective vehicle manufacturer or importer. Validity: The current Bharat NCAP regulations remain valid until September 30, 2027, after which Bharat NCAP 2.0 is expected to be implemented by October 2027. About Bharat NCAP 2.0 Draft Guidelines: Based on 5 pillars: The Bharat NCAP 2.0 proposal introduces a 100-point rating system across five pillars- Crash Protection, Vulnerable Road-User Protection, Safe Driving, Accident Avoidance, and Post-Crash Safety. Use of minimum score in a rating system: From 2027-29, a 5-star rating will require 70 points, and this would rise to 80 points from 2029-31. Minimum scores will also apply across each pillar. Updated norms: It brings in fresh mandatory tests, revised scoring methods, and updated safety verticals. Uniqueness: Notably, for the first time, vehicles will be assessed on vulnerable road user protection. Expansion of crash test: The crash test will be expanded from two to five and will now have Male, female, and child dummies for testing. The cars will go through offset frontal impact, full-width frontal impact, side impact, and rear impact. Curtain airbags compulsory: Electronic stability control (ESC) and curtain airbags will be compulsory for any model seeking a star rating. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) remains optional. Source: India Today (MAINS Focus) Strengthening the POSH Act: Closing Gaps in Workplace Justice (UPSC GS Paper II – “Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions for Vulnerable Sections; Issues Relating to Women”)   Context (Introduction) A recent Chandigarh case where a college professor was dismissed following an ICC probe under the POSH Act has revived debate on low conviction rates, procedural gaps, digital-era challenges, and the Act’s inability to address informed consent and power asymmetry in academic institutions.   Main Arguments Conceptual Clarity: The Act’s focus on consent without recognising informed consent overlooks manipulation, emotional coercion, and power asymmetry in workplaces and universities. Emotional Exploitation: Emotional or psychological harassment arising from deceitful relationships remains outside the Act’s scope despite being a prominent form of abuse in hierarchical settings. Time-Barred Justice: The three-month limitation period discourages survivors who often need longer to recognise manipulation, gather evidence, and overcome fear of institutional backlash. Diluted Terminology: Referring to the accused as a “respondent” rather than “accused” symbolically downplays the gravity of sexual harassment compared to similar acts outside workplaces. Behavioural Evidence: Ambiguous definitions make ICCs rely heavily on direct evidence, ignoring circumstantial indicators or behavioural patterns that commonly characterise harassment cases.   Challenges / Criticisms  Inter-Institutional Blind Spot: The Act lacks mechanisms to address misconduct spanning multiple campuses despite frequent cross-institutional interactions in academia. Procedural Trauma: Complainants often face delays, institutional hesitation, emotional fatigue, and fear of counter-action under the “malicious complaint” clause. Digital Evidence Gaps: ICCs struggle to interpret modern digital evidence—disappearing messages, encrypted chats, single-view photos—due to lack of legal and technical training. Institutional Under preparedness: ICCs remain unevenly trained and often risk-averse, unintentionally reinforcing protection for powerful perpetrators over vulnerable complainants. Silent Serial Offenders: Absence of information-sharing or cross-institution coordination enables repeat offenders to continue exploiting multiple academic environments.   Way Forward Expand Definitions: Incorporate informed consent, emotional coercion, and digital harassment into statutory definitions to reflect contemporary realities. Extend Timelines: Increase or remove the three-month limitation period to ensure survivors are not denied justice due to delayed recognition or fear. Improve Evidence Protocols: Develop clear guidelines for handling digital evidence and expand the use of corroborative or behavioural indicators in ICC assessments. Build ICC Capacity: Mandate periodic legal, psychological, and technological training for ICC members to improve sensitivity and evidence evaluation. Inter-Institutional Mechanisms: Create a confidential national or sectoral registry enabling institutions to share information on proven offenders to prevent serial misconduct.   Conclusion The POSH Act was transformative in 2013, but evolving power structures, digital interactions, and emotional manipulation demand a stronger, clearer, survivor-centric law in 2025. Justice must be embedded in the system, not dependent on a victim’s endurance or institutional goodwill.   Mains Question  Despite being a landmark legislation, the POSH Act, 2013 faces gaps that dilute its effectiveness. Critically evaluate these challenges and suggest reforms to strengthen workplace justice for women.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu Row over DGP Appointment in Tamil Nadu: Federal Tensions in Police Reforms (UPSC GS Paper II – “Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary; Issues and Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure; Role of UPSC”)   Context (Introduction) Tamil Nadu’s inability to appoint a regular Director-General of Police before the incumbent’s retirement, rejection of the UPSC panel, and allegations of contempt of Supreme Court guidelines have reignited debates on State autonomy, police reforms, and Centre–State coordination.   Main Arguments: Why the Issue Matters Prakash Singh Mandate: The 2006 judgment mandates that States select the DGP only from a UPSC-approved panel of the three seniormost eligible IPS officers based on service length, record, and experience. Tenure Protection: The Court’s requirement of a minimum two-year fixed tenure for DGPs seeks to depoliticise police leadership and promote administrative continuity. Procedural Timeline: States must send proposals to the UPSC three months before the anticipated vacancy, a rule Tamil Nadu violated by submitting its list only a day before retirement. Autonomy vs Oversight: The State’s rejection of the UPSC panel as “unacceptable” highlights ongoing tensions between State preference and UPSC-mandated merit-based selection. Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s request for immediate appointment after UPSC recommendations underscores the judiciary’s role in enforcing police reform compliance.   Challenges / Criticisms  Delayed Compliance: Tamil Nadu’s failure to meet the three-month proposal deadline disrupted the selection process and invited judicial scrutiny. CAT Proceedings: Pending litigation before the Central Administrative Tribunal delayed the State’s actions, yet the Court held that this cannot justify procedural non-compliance. Withheld Integrity Certificate: The State withdrew integrity clearance for one officer and expressed reluctance to consider three others without transparent explanations. Panel Rejection: Tamil Nadu’s objection to the UPSC panel and request for another meeting contradicted the structured process laid down in Prakash Singh. Contempt Allegations: Appointment of an “in-charge” DGP instead of a regular one has triggered contempt petitions alleging wilful violation of Supreme Court guidelines.   Way Forward Strict Adherence: States must comply with the Prakash Singh framework to ensure transparency, stability, and depoliticisation of police leadership. Timeline Discipline: Institutionalising internal reminders and administrative protocols can prevent last-minute submissions that derail the selection process. Integrity Transparency: Clear, recorded reasons for withholding integrity certificates must be shared with the UPSC to prevent arbitrariness. Cooperative Federalism: Structured consultation between State governments and the UPSC can reduce conflict while respecting the merit-based selection process. Monitoring Mechanism: A periodic compliance audit by the Supreme Court or an independent oversight body could strengthen police reform implementation nationwide.   Conclusion The DGP appointment controversy in Tamil Nadu highlights the unresolved tension between political discretion and judicially mandated police reforms. Ensuring merit-based selection, transparent procedures, and timely coordination is essential to build a professional, independent police leadership.   Mains Question  The Prakash Singh reforms sought to depoliticise police leadership through transparent and merit-based appointments. Discuss (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Hindu Indian Constitution Beyond Western Liberalism: A Transformative Rights Vision (UPSC GS Paper II – “Indian Constitution—Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions; Comparison with Other Constitutions”)   Context (Introduction) As India marks 76 years of the Constitution’s adoption, renewed analysis highlights how its framers deliberately moved beyond Western constitutional models, designing a transformative charter that addressed social hierarchies, group rights, and structural inequalities embedded in India’s social fabric.   Why India’s Constitutional Vision Was Ahead of Its Time Transformative Equality: The Constitution expanded equality beyond Western notions by recognising caste-driven discrimination from both the state and private actors through Articles 14, 15(2), 17, and 23. Social Power Recognition: By acknowledging that power in India is wielded not only by the state but also by entrenched social groups, the Constitution mandated state action to dismantle societal hierarchies. Affirmative Action Leadership: India introduced constitutionally sanctioned reservations in 1950, a decade before U.S. civil rights reforms, making it a global pioneer in group-differentiated rights. Secular Pluralism: The Constitution adopted a nuanced secular framework—eschewing state religion, prohibiting compulsory religious taxes (Art. 27), and safeguarding individual (Art. 25) and group religious freedoms (Art. 26). Minority Cultural Rights: Through Articles 29 and 30, the Constitution empowered linguistic and religious minorities to preserve their culture and manage educational institutions, ensuring pluralist nation-building.   Challenges / Criticisms  Partial Rights Protection: Certain freedoms remained circumscribed due to colonial-era emergency provisions, allowing governments to suspend rights in broad circumstances. Executive Dominance: The Constitution created a powerful executive with sweeping discretionary powers, raising concerns about civil liberty safeguards. Uneven Pluralism: While minority and cultural protections exist, their scope has sometimes been reduced or inconsistently implemented. Debates on Group Rights: Intense Constituent Assembly debates reflected tensions between equality and differentiated protections, leaving some ambiguities unresolved. Limitations of Remedies: Judicial review exists, but access to remedies can be limited when rights are suspended under exceptional circumstances.   Deepening the Constitution’s Transformative Promise Strengthen Social Equality: Reinforce constitutional mandates against societal discrimination through stronger implementation of Articles 15(2) and 17. Balance Executive Power: Revisit emergency provisions and enhance institutional checks to prevent misuse of executive authority. Promote Pluralist Governance: Uphold minority cultural and educational rights consistently to preserve India’s pluralism in practice. Expand Rights Awareness: Enhance civic education and public literacy on constitutional rights to democratise access to justice. Safeguard Transformative Vision: Protect affirmative action and group-differentiated rights as foundational tools against structural inequality.   Conclusion India’s Constitution is not merely a legal document but a transformative project that acknowledges deep social inequalities and plural identities. Its endurance reflects a commitment to equality that respects diversity, showing that national unity and constitutional longevity emerge not from uniformity, but from inclusive recognition of difference.   Mains Question The Indian Constitution deliberately moved beyond Western liberal constitutionalism. Critically examine how this transformative vision has shaped India’s constitutional experience. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express

Daily Prelims CA Quiz

UPSC Quiz – 2025 : IASbaba’s Daily Current Affairs Quiz 25th November 2025

The Current Affairs questions are based on sources like ‘The Hindu’, ‘Indian Express’ and ‘PIB’, which are very important sources for UPSC Prelims Exam. The questions are focused on both the concepts and facts. The topics covered here are generally different from what is being covered under ‘Daily Current Affairs/Daily News Analysis (DNA) and Daily Static Quiz’ to avoid duplication. The questions would be published from Monday to Saturday before 2 PM. One should not spend more than 10 minutes on this initiative. Gear up and Make the Best Use of this initiative. Do remember that, “the difference between Ordinary and EXTRA-Ordinary is PRACTICE!!” Important Note: Don’t forget to post your marks in the comment section. Also, let us know if you enjoyed today’s test 🙂 After completing the 5 questions, click on ‘View Questions’ to check your score, time taken, and solutions. .To take the Test Click Here

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 25th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) Advisory Jurisdiction of SC Category: Polity and Governance Context: The Supreme Court has provided its opinion on a Presidential reference made under Article 143. About Advisory Jurisdiction of SC: Related Article: Article 143 (Advisory jurisdiction) empowers the President of India to seek the SC’s advisory opinion on any question of law or fact that is of public importance and is likely to arise or has already arisen. Exclusivity: The SC’s advisory jurisdiction is exclusive to the President. Significance: It gives the President the power to refer any question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its opinion, based on the Union Council of Ministers’ advice. Opinion not binding: The opinion expressed by the SC is only advisory and not a judicial pronouncement. Hence, it is not binding on the president; she may follow or may not follow the opinion. Acts as authoritative legal opinion: Though advisory in nature, it facilitates the government to have an authoritative legal opinion on a matter to be decided by it. Minimum bench of 5 judges: Article 145 (3) requires such references to be heard by a bench of at least five judges. Historical Context: Advisory jurisdiction under Article 143 is derived from the Government of India Act, 1935, which allowed the Governor-General to refer legal questions to the federal court. The Canadian Constitution allows its SC to provide legal opinions, while the US SC refrains from giving advisory opinions to uphold a strict separation of powers.  Past Instances of Such References: Some landmark cases include:  Delhi Laws Act case (1951): Defined the scope of delegated legislation.  Kerala Education Bill (1958): Harmonized Fundamental Rights with Directive Principles.  Berubari case (1960): Held that territorial cession requires a constitutional amendment.  Keshav Singh case (1965): Explained legislative privileges.  Presidential poll case (1974): Allowed elections despite vacancies in State Assemblies.  Third Judges case (1998): Established the Collegium system for judicial appointments.  Source: The Hindu LuPEX Mission Category: Science and Technology Context: A Japanese delegation recently held discussions with the senior leadership of the ISRO and visited the facilities of the space agency to review the status of the LuPEX mission. About LuPEX Mission: Collaborating agencies: It is a collaborative mission between Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). Objective: It aims to explore the moon’s southern polar region, investigating the presence of water and other elements, potentially in the form of surface ice. Scheduled launch: The mission is scheduled to launch in 2025. Uniqueness: The LUPEX will be a precursor to the ISRO’s lunar sample return mission and for sending the first Indian to the moon by 2040. Launch vehicles: The mission will be launched by JAXA onboard its H3-24L launch vehicle, carrying the ISRO-made lunar lander, which will carry the MHI, Japan-made lunar rover. Focus on lunar night survival: It aims to showcase innovative surface exploration technologies. The special focus is on vehicular transport and lunar night survival. Functions of rover: The rover will drive on its own to search for areas where water is likely to be present and sample the soil by digging into the ground with a drill. It will be equipped with instruments for measuring the water content of regolith (lunar sand), drilling, and sampling. Instruments of other space agencies carried: The rover will carry not only the instruments of ISRO and JAXA but also those of the US space agency NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). Source: The Hindu Dorjilung Hydroelectric Power Project Category: Environment and Ecology Context: Tata Power Company Ltd said it has signed commercial agreements with Druk Green Power Corporation Ltd (DGPC) for the development of Dorjilung hydroelectric power project in Bhutan. About Dorjilung Hydroelectric Power Project: Location: It is a planned 1125 MW run-of-river project situated in the eastern Lhuentse and Mongar Districts of Bhutan. Associated river: It will be built on the Kurichhu River, a tributary of the Drangmechhu that flows into India. Partnership: Bhutan’s Druk Green Power Corporation (DGPC) has signed an MoU with Tata Power Company Limited for the joint development of the project. Use of SPV: The Project will be implemented through a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), with DGPC and Tata Power holding equity shares of 60% and 40%, respectively. Completion of the project: The project is expected to be commissioned by early 2032. Role of world bank: The project is financed by the World Bank. Power capacity: At a height of approximately 139.5 m, the concrete-gravity dam channels nearly 287 m3/s through a 15 km headrace tunnel to an underground powerhouse housing six Francis turbines, designed to generate around 4.5 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually. Estimated cost: At a total project cost of ₹13,100 crore, Dorjilung will be Bhutan’s second-largest hydropower project, and the largest Public–Private Partnership (PPP) hydro project ever undertaken in the country.  Source: CNBC TV 18 Brihadeeswarar Temple Category: History and Culture Context: Marking World Heritage Week, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) organised a heritage walk and clean-up drive at the Brihadeeswarar Temple in Thanjavur. About Brihadeeswarar Temple: Location: It is a Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva located in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu. Other names: It is also known as Periya Kovil, RajaRajeswara Temple and Rajarajesvaram.  Dravidian temple: It is one of the largest temples in India and is an example of Dravidian architecture during the Chola period. Construction: It was built by emperor Raja Raja Chola I and completed in 1010 AD. Uniqueness: It is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site known as the “Great Living Chola Temples”, with the other two being the Brihadeeswarar Temple, Gangaikonda Cholapuram and Airavatesvara temple. Cultural Significance: It has a repository of Tamil inscriptions detailing rituals, gifts, and the temple’s construction overseen by Raja Raja Chola himself. Use of granite: The entire temple structure is made out of granite. Structure: The vimanam (temple tower) is 216 ft (66 m) high and is the tallest in the world. The Kumbam (the apex or the bulbous structure on the top) of the temple is carved out of a single rock and weighs around 80 tons. Area: The temple complex spans over 40 acres and is decorated with masses of sculptures and inscriptions that spotlight the era’s devotion and craftsmanship. Nandi statue at entrance: There is a big statue of Nandi (sacred bull), carved out of a single rock measuring about 16 ft (4.9 m) long and 13 ft (4.0 m) high at the entrance.  Source: The Hindu African Grey Parrot Category: Environment and Ecology Context: Recently, RTI responses revealed that State Forest Departments across India have no record of African grey parrot trade. About African Grey Parrot: Nature: It is a medium-sized, dusty-looking grey bird. Scientific Name: Its scientific name is Psittacus Erithacus. Uniqueness: It is one of the most talented talking/mimicking birds on the planet. Distribution: African grey parrots are native to West and Central Africa. They are kept as pets in many parts of the world, and their popularity dates back centuries. Habitat: They inhabit different types of lowland forest, including rainforest, woodlands, and wooded savannah. They can be seen along forest edges and in clearings as well, and sometimes feeding in gardens and cultivated fields. Lifespan: Usually, they live for more than 50 years. Features: It is a mottled grey-coloured, medium-sized parrot. It has a large black bill and white mask enclosing a yellow eye and has a striking red vent and tail.  Difference between males and females: Females have a pale grey crown with dark gray edges, a grey body, and scarlet tail feathers. The male looks similar to the female but becomes darker with age. Conservation Status: It is classified as ‘Endangered‘ under the IUCN Red List. It is is listed under Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). Source: The Hindu (MAINS Focus) Farmers Must Reap Fruits of Genetic Engineering (UPSC GS Paper III – “Agriculture, Biotechnology and Food Security”)   Context (Introduction) India’s projected 1.7 billion population by 2060, coupled with shrinking agricultural land, water stress, and climate volatility, makes genome editing and modern biotechnology essential tools to secure long-term food supply, nutrition, and farmer resilience.   Main Arguments: Why India Needs Genetic Engineering? Productivity Plateau: India’s crop yields have stagnated, and genome-edited varieties can reverse this trend at a time when the country spends $20 billion annually on edible oil imports. Climate Resilience: CRISPR-edited drought-, heat-, and salinity-tolerant lines like the improved Samba Mahsuri offer crucial protection amid rising climate shocks. Nutrition Security: Genome editing can enhance micronutrient density in staples, essential when one-third of Indian children remain stunted due to persistent malnutrition. Indigenous Technology: ICAR’s new TnpB-based editing tool strengthens India’s seed sovereignty by reducing dependence on CRISPR technologies controlled by foreign institutions. Resource Efficiency: GE crops improve water- and nutrient-use efficiency—critical as India is expected to enter severe water scarcity (<1,000 m³ per capita) by 2050.   Challenges Hindering Adoption Regulatory Uncertainty: Overlapping GM–GE rules and prolonged approval timelines discourage researchers and delay deployment of safe, non-transgenic innovations. Activist Opposition: Ideological resistance masquerading as environmentalism fuels distrust and blocked earlier breakthroughs like GM mustard. Perceived Monopolies: Concerns over corporate control persist even when the technologies (like TnpB) are public-sector and indigenously developed. Information Deficit: Low public awareness and circulating misinformation create political hesitancy and slow acceptance of GE crops. Scientific Demoralisation: Two decades since Bt Bollgard-II (2006) without new approvals have weakened morale among agricultural scientists and stalled innovation pipelines.   Way Forward Regulatory Clarity: India needs a differentiated, science-based framework—similar to Japan and Argentina—that fast-tracks approvals for non-transgenic genome-edited crops. Public-Sector Leadership: Greater ICAR funding and open-licensing models can ensure that genome-edited seeds remain affordable for small and marginal farmers. Field Validation: Large-scale demonstrations through Krishi Vigyan Kendras must highlight real-world improvements in yields, stress tolerance, and reduced chemical use. Scientific Literacy: A national GE awareness mission should counter misinformation through transparent communication involving universities, panchayats, and extension workers. Innovation Ecosystem: An integrated agri-biotech corridor connecting start-ups, ICAR labs, incubators, and seed companies can accelerate safe, equitable dissemination.   Conclusion India’s future food and nutrition security will depend on its readiness to embrace safe, indigenous, precision breeding technologies. Rejecting genome editing due to misplaced fears risks deepening rural distress, increasing import dependence, and weakening the scientific foundations of Indian agriculture.   Mains Question  Genetic engineering offers transformative potential for India’s agriculture, yet its progress has been hindered by regulatory hesitation and societal scepticism. Analyse the need, challenges, and way forward for GE technologies in the Indian context.(250 words, 15 marks)   Source: Indian Express Amplitude of Gubernatorial Discretion and Constitutional Balance (UPSC GS Paper II – “Federalism, Centre–State Relations, Role of Constitutional Authorities”)   Context (Introduction) The Supreme Court’s recent advisory opinion on Article 200, addressing the Governor’s discretion over State Bills and the absence of time limits, has revived debates on federal balance, constitutional morality, and the long-standing friction between Union-appointed Governors and elected State governments.   Main Arguments: Federal Tension: Expanding discretionary authority under Article 200 deepens structural frictions between Union-appointed Governors and opposition-ruled States, weakening cooperative federalism. Legislative Bottleneck: Indefinite delays in assent—such as past instances where Bills remained pending before the President for up to seven years—undermine legislative functioning and democratic accountability. Constituent Intent: Constituent Assembly debates and B.N. Rau’s notes indicate that discretionary powers in assenting to Bills were consciously removed, highlighting the need to uphold original constitutional design. Anti-Defection Impact: The Court’s assumption about assured majority support post-Tenth Schedule oversimplifies scenarios involving coalition shifts, making implicit discretion an unreliable safeguard. Governance Stability: Frequent disputes over assent impair day-to-day governance, as seen in multiple States approaching courts to compel Governors to act, reflecting a serious administrative and constitutional vacuum.   Challenges / Criticisms  Expanded Discretion: The Court’s view effectively widens the Governor’s non-justiciable discretion, risking a shift from constitutional figurehead to active political arbiter. Weak Appointment Process: Ignoring recommendations of the Sarkaria, Venkatachaliah, and Punchhi Commissions has enabled politically motivated appointments, heightening partisan conflict. Political Friction: As Soli Sorabjee noted, using governorship as a role for “burnt-out politicians” exacerbates tensions when different parties control the Union and States. Judicial Vacuum: By refusing to prescribe timelines, the advisory opinion limits judicial remedies against prolonged inaction, perpetuating constitutional uncertainty. Risk of Gubernatorial Governance: If assent, withholding, and returning Bills become fully discretionary and non-reviewable, the Governor may effectively override the democratically elected State government.   Way Forward:  Codified Timelines: Amending Article 200 to introduce strict timelines, as recommended by past commissions, would ensure timely legislative processing. Depoliticised Appointments: Adopting a consultative appointment mechanism—such as involvement of the Chief Minister or an inter-State council—can reduce partisan bias. Narrow Interpretation: Limiting discretion strictly to cases involving constitutional violations, in line with the Sarkaria Commission’s narrow construction, would restore federal balance. Judicial Oversight: Allowing courts to review prolonged or unexplained delays can prevent constitutional paralysis without undermining executive authority. Cooperative Protocols: Establishing Union–State coordination mechanisms for resolving disputes over assent can reduce litigation and strengthen democratic functioning.   Conclusion Unchecked and non-justiciable gubernatorial discretion risks destabilising India’s carefully balanced federal architecture. Reforms—both procedural and constitutional—are essential to ensure that the Governor performs a neutral constitutional role while safeguarding democratic processes and legislative autonomy.   Mains Question The Supreme Court’s advisory opinion on Article 200 has widened the scope of gubernatorial discretion, raising concerns about federal balance and legislative autonomy. Critically analyse the constitutional, political, and administrative implications of this development.(250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu

Daily Prelims CA Quiz

UPSC Quiz – 2025 : IASbaba’s Daily Current Affairs Quiz 22nd November 2025

The Current Affairs questions are based on sources like ‘The Hindu’, ‘Indian Express’ and ‘PIB’, which are very important sources for UPSC Prelims Exam. The questions are focused on both the concepts and facts. The topics covered here are generally different from what is being covered under ‘Daily Current Affairs/Daily News Analysis (DNA) and Daily Static Quiz’ to avoid duplication. The questions would be published from Monday to Saturday before 2 PM. One should not spend more than 10 minutes on this initiative. Gear up and Make the Best Use of this initiative. Do remember that, “the difference between Ordinary and EXTRA-Ordinary is PRACTICE!!” Important Note: Don’t forget to post your marks in the comment section. Also, let us know if you enjoyed today’s test 🙂 After completing the 5 questions, click on ‘View Questions’ to check your score, time taken, and solutions. .To take the Test Click Here

DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 24th November – 2025

Archives (PRELIMS  Focus) Sangai Festival Category: History and Culture Context: Recently, the Sangai Festival in Manipur began amid a protest by internally displaced persons (IDPs) and members of NGOs, impacting attendance. About Sangai Festival: Location: It is celebrated in the state of Manipur. Nomenclature: It is an annual festival, started in the year 2010, which is named after the state animal, the Sangai. Objective: It aims to showcase Manipur’s rich cultural heritage and indigenous tradition. The festival promotes the cultural extravaganza of Manipur through music, dance and various native art forms that are part of the Manipuri tribes and people. Use of Ras Leela: The state’s classical dance form, ‘Ras Leela,’ renowned for its distinctiveness, takes centre stage during the festival.  Theme: The themes of 2025 is “Where blossoms breathe harmony.” About Sangai: Endemic to Manipur: It is a subspecies of Eld’s deer endemic to Manipur. It also has immense cultural relevance to Manipur. Distribution: It is found only in Keibul Lamjao National Park – the largest single mass of phumdi is in the Loktak Lake – in Manipur’s Bishnupur district. Appearance: It is a medium-sized deer, with uniquely distinctive antlers, with extremely long brow tine, which form the main beam. Uniqueness: The animal’s coat is a dark reddish brown during winter months and it becomes a much lighter shade in summer. Also known as dancing deer: It walks on the hind surface of its pasterns with mincing and hops over floating foliage. Therefore, it also called the dancing deer. Threat: While the habitats have been encroached for grazing, cultivation, and fish farming, the animals are highly threatened by a hydro-electric project in the lake. Conservation status CITES: Appendix I IUCN: Critically Endangered Wildlife Protection Act 1972: Schedule-1 Source: The Hindu Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) Category: Polity and Governance Context:  FSSAI issued an order to all the States/UTs Commissioners of Food Safety asking them to remove all non-compliant ORS products from shops immediately. About Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI): Nature: It is an autonomous body established under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Establishment: It has been established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, which is a consolidating statute related to food safety and regulation in India. Mandate: It is responsible for setting food standards, regulating the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, and import of food, and ensuring the availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption. Structure: The FSSAI comprises of a Chairperson and twenty two members out of which one – third are to be women. The Chairperson of FSSAI is appointed by the Central Government. Formulates standards and guidelines: It formulates standards for various food products, ensuring they are safe for consumption. It also provides guidelines for businesses to implement effective food safety management practices. Undertakes inspection and auditing: Regular inspections and audits are conducted to assess compliance with food safety standards. Initiatives to educate the public about food safety, hygiene, and nutrition are a key focus area. Issues food licences: Anyone selling or importing food in India needs a food licence issued by FSSAI. It also directly monitors compliance of food regulations, especially in the area of food imports to India.  Ensures food import controls: FSSAI officers carry out food import controls and ensure that they contain no harmful ingredients. To do this, they send selected test products from the import to accredited laboratories for inspection. Accreditation of food laboratories: The FSSAI is responsible for the accreditation of food testing laboratories throughout India. FSSAI has notified 14 referral labs, 72 State/UT labs across India, and 112 NABL approved commercial labs, all of which are situated throughout the country. Source: India Today Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary Category: Environment and Ecology Context: Recently, 9-day wildlife census began in Sukhna wildlife sanctuary. About Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary: Location: It is a protected area located in Chandigarh, near the famous Sukhna Lake at the foothills of the Shivalik range. History: The lake was created by the architect Le Corbusier in 1958 by diverting the Sukhna Choe, a seasonal stream that flows down from the Shivalik hills. The sanctuary was developed as a result of afforestation done for soil conservation around the lake. Area: Spreading over an area of over 25.98 square km (about 6420 acres), Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary was established in 1998. Structure: The place is quite unstable geographically and becomes prone to soil erosion by surface runoff during rains. It has sandy soil of Shivalik with pockets of clay embedded at places. Vegetation: It is characterized by a mix of forests, grasslands, and wetlands, with the Sukhna Lake forming an important part of the ecosystem. Flora: The common flora of the sanctuary includes Khair, Phulai, Kikar, Shisham, Moonj, Amaltas, Jhingan, Amla, Rati, Vasaka, and many more. Fauna:  Squirrel, Common-Mongoose, Indian Hare, Porcupine, Jungle Cat, Jackal, Wild boar, etc, are the mammals found in the sanctuary. Peacock, Hill myna, Jungle crow, Black drongo, Parrots, Doves, and others are the common birds of this region. Source: The Tribune Meerut Bugle Category: Miscellaneous Context: Meerut bugle, commonly used in military parades, earns GI tag. About Meerut Bugle: Nature: The Meerut bugle is a brass wind instrument used in military drills, parades, ceremonies, and signals across the Army, paramilitary forces, and police units in India. Uses: It is used in the drills of armed forces and in wars, ceremonies, and parades for decades. It is also used to signal the start of movements or events, and carries a deep historical imprint. Origin: The bugle-making in Meerut dates back to the late 19th century. The bugle’s story is closely linked to the development of India’s military traditions. Meerut as centre of bugle making: Over time, the craft of bugle making has evolved into a specialised local industry, making Meerut one of India’s main centres for handmade bugles. Making: The making of a bugle is entirely manual. A brass sheet is cut and hammered into shape using a specialised die. The sheet is moulded and processed through several stages to achieve a smooth finish, and finally fitted with a mouthpiece. Significance: It represents a living military heritage linking colonial-era communication tools to modern ceremonial functions. Types of bugles manufactured: Copper bugle: the highest in demand across India. Gold-finish bugle: featuring a polished gold-like surface. Silver-finish bugle: Produced on request. Source: The New Indian Express Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) Topic: Economy Context: Recently, the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) signed a series of major agreements to boost cargo movement, and river-based tourism in the Northeast. About Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI): Nature: It is a statutory body established under the Inland Waterways Authority of India Act (IWAI), 1985. Establishment: It came into existence on 27th October 1986 for the development and regulation of inland waterways for shipping and navigation.  Nodal Ministry: It comes under the Ministry of ports, shipping, and waterways. Objective: It primarily undertakes projects for development and maintenance of inland water transport (IWT) infrastructure on national waterways through grants received from the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways. Headquarters: Its headquarters is located in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Regional offices: It also has its regional offices at Patna, Kolkata, Guwahati, and Kochi and sub-offices at Allahabad, Varanasi, Farakka, Sahibganj, Haldia, Swroopganj, Hemnagar, Dibrugarh, Dhubri, Silchar, Kollam, Bhubaneshwar, and Vijayawada. Advices centre and states: It advises the Central Government on matters related to IWT and assists States in the development of the IWT sector. It also takes up techno-economic feasibility studies and prepares proposals for the declaration of other waterways as National Waterways. Key functions: Developing National Waterways such as NW-1 Ganga, NW-2 Brahmaputra, NW-16 Barak, etc.) Fairway development such as dredging, channel marking, river training works. Navigation infrastructure such as terminals, jetties, Ro-Ro/Ro-Pax services, night navigation systems. Regulation of vessel movement, pilotage, and coordination with state IWT departments. Source: DD News (MAINS Focus) A Five-Point Judicial Reform Agenda for the New CJI (UPSC GS Paper II – “Separation of powers; functioning of the judiciary”)   Context (Introduction) Justice Surya Kant becomes India’s 53rd CJI at a moment when 153 million cases are pending across courts, 300+ HC vacancies persist, and debates over judicial independence, mediation and legal capacity-building demand urgent, evidence-backed institutional action.   Main Arguments  The new CJI’s 15-month tenure includes responsibility for recommending six Supreme Court judges and filling over 300 High Court vacancies, giving him a historic opportunity to shape the judiciary’s next generation. According to the National Judicial Data Grid (September 2025), India faces a pendency of 47.56 million cases in district courts, 6.38 million in HCs, and 88,000 in the SC, with delays threatening the meaning of timely justice. With 1.8 million lawyers and one lakh new entrants annually, India lacks a national-level training institution for advocates despite having judicial academies for judges. Justice Surya Kant emphasises that mediators “choose understanding over victory” and notes that the Mediation Act 2023 provides India’s most comprehensive legal framework for dispute resolution. Episodes such as ADM Jabalpur (1976) highlight the continuing importance of judicial independence in safeguarding constitutional rights.   Criticisms /Issues   Persistent judicial vacancies slow appointments, affect diversity—especially the inclusion of women judges—and weaken public faith in the collegium. Pendency remains alarming because the government is the litigant in 50% of cases, contributing significantly to avoidable delays. The absence of a national academy means independent practitioners lack structured, modern training unlike peers in the corporate legal sector. Mediation uptake is slow because many lawyers remain unconvinced, despite empirical evidence that court dockets reduce when pre-litigation mediation is institutionalised. The long shadow of the Emergency demonstrates that judicial passivity can enable rights violations, making independence a constant institutional obligation rather than a historical lesson.   Reforms  Speeding up SC and HC appointments—including the six imminent SC seats—can directly reduce pendency and increase diversity. A multi-pronged pendency strategy involving technology, strict adjournment rules, streamlined appeals, and government-judiciary coordination aligns with the CJI’s warning that legal aid “loses meaning when justice arrives too late.” A national academy for lawyers can bridge capacity gaps for India’s 1.8 million advocates by standardising training in advocacy, ethics, technology and mediation. Scaling the Mediation Act 2023 through Bar cooperation can significantly ease case inflows and preserve social relationships, as highlighted repeatedly by Justice Surya Kant. Strengthening judicial independence through transparent processes and rights-protective jurisprudence ensures the judiciary never repeats failures like ADM Jabalpur, which remains a constitutional caution.   Conclusion Justice Surya Kant’s leadership arrives when vacancies, pendency, uneven legal training, weak mediation culture and independence concerns converge; addressing these with factual, targeted reforms can reinforce India’s constitutional promise of “complete justice” under Article 142.   Mains Question Discuss the reforms required to reduce pendency and strengthen judicial independence in India. What steps have been taken in recent times in this direction. (250 words, 15 marks)   Source: The Indian Express Reforming State Public Service Commissions (PSCs) (UPSC GS Paper II – “Government policies and interventions; Role of constitutional and non-constitutional bodies”)   Context (Introduction) State Public Service Commissions struggle with controversies, litigation, irregular recruitment cycles, structural weaknesses, and credibility deficits, making systematic reforms essential to ensure transparent, timely, and merit-based appointments in State administrations.   Main Arguments  State PSCs face a persistent trust deficit because frequent exam cancellations, paper leaks and errors routinely force aspirants to seek judicial intervention. India’s PSC system originated in constitutional evolution, beginning with the 1926 Public Service Commission, expanded under the Government of India Act 1935, and retained in the Constitution for the Union and each State. The Montagu–Chelmsford reforms first endorsed a permanent, politically insulated authority to ensure merit-based recruitment, laying the conceptual foundation for present-day PSCs. The UPSC operates in a relatively neutral environment with members of proven experience and pan-India representation, unlike State PSCs which often reflect political influence in appointments. The Union’s dedicated Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (1985) ensures regular vacancy declarations and coordinated personnel policy, enabling UPSC to function on predictable timelines. States often lack such structured manpower planning, leading to irregular vacancy notifications, postponed recruitments, and extension of superannuation ages. UPSC periodically revises syllabi through committees of academics, civil servants and specialists, while most State PSCs seldom revise syllabi or appoint expert panels. UPSC maintains high evaluation standards through “inter-se moderation” and national-level paper setters, whereas State PSCs rely mostly on local academic resources, limiting quality and neutrality. Complexities of reservations—vertical, horizontal, and zonal—create frequent litigation in State PSC results, delaying recruitment cycles.   Criticisms / Drawbacks (One sentence each) Political interference in appointments undermines professional standards and independence of State PSCs. Irregular manpower planning prevents annual or predictable examination cycles, eroding trust among aspirants. Limited academic pools and absence of national-level experts reduce the quality and neutrality of question-setting. Inadequate moderation and evaluation systems make State PSC examinations vulnerable to inconsistencies and challenges. Weak capacity to handle complex reservation matrices often results in errors that culminate in prolonged court cases.   Reforms  States should create dedicated Departments/Ministries of Personnel to institutionalise manpower planning and publish five-year recruitment roadmaps. A constitutional amendment should prescribe a minimum age of 55 and maximum age of 65 for PSC members to ensure appointment of experienced, senior professionals. Mandatory eligibility norms should require secretarial-level administrative experience for official members and 10 years of professional practice for non-official experts. A State-wide panel of eminent persons—shortlisted with inputs from the Leader of the Opposition—should guide appointments to enhance neutrality and credibility. Syllabi should undergo periodic revision with public consultation and alignment with evolving academic standards and UPSC benchmarks. State-specific knowledge (e.g., regional economy, culture, or geography) should be tested mostly in objective format to minimise subjectivity and evaluation asymmetry. Main examinations should adopt a hybrid structure (objective + descriptive) to ensure both analytical rigour and fairness. Question translation into regional languages should combine encrypted technological tools with expert bilingual reviewers to prevent distortions in meaning. Frequent pattern changes and innovative question-setting should be introduced to reduce predictability and curb dependence on AI-generated content. The Secretary of each State PSC should be a senior officer with prior experience in school or intermediate education boards to strengthen examination administration.   Conclusion Systematic reforms in personnel planning, member selection, syllabus revision, evaluation practices and administrative professionalism can restore trust in State PSCs and elevate them to the standards of transparency, credibility and efficiency associated with the UPSC.   UPSC Mains Question Despite their constitutional status, State PSCs continue to face credibility issues arising from procedural lapses and political interference. Critically examine the problems and propose reforms. (250 words, 15 marks) Source: The Hindu